Hi Yuao,
Yuao Ma wrote:
>//but the testcases don't seem to be conditionalized on this. Would the
>//new tests fail if gcc is built against an insufficiently recent version
>//of mpfr,
…
The test case is indeed conditionalized, though in a different manner
than you
might expect. The condition
Hi Dave,
> but the testcases don't seem to be conditionalized on this. Would the
> new tests fail if gcc is built against an insufficiently recent version
> of mpfr, and is/should there be some kind of dg-requires for this, so
> that the new tests gracefully are "UNSUPPORTED" on such configuration
Toon, thank you! I will give it a try here so we can have some data points.
Jerry
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025, 2:08 PM Toon Moene wrote:
> On 6/26/25 21:34, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> > Am 26.06.25 um 10:15 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
>
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >>> I have a few questions.
> >>>
> >>> First
On 6/26/25 21:34, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Am 26.06.25 um 10:15 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
Hi Thomas,
I have a few questions.
First, I see that your patch series does not use gfortran's descriptors
for accessing coarrays via shared memory, as the original work by
Nicolas did. Can you comment
Am 26.06.25 um 10:15 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
Hi Thomas,
I have a few questions.
First, I see that your patch series does not use gfortran's descriptors
for accessing coarrays via shared memory, as the original work by
Nicolas did. Can you comment on that?
The ABI for invoking coarray fun
On Thu, 2025-06-26 at 17:45 +, Yuao Ma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch, a follow-up to r16-1652-g0606d2b979f401, implements
> middle-end
> optimizations (e.g., constant folding) for our trigonometric pi-based
> function
> built-ins.
>
> This patch is part of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fo
Hi all,
This patch, a follow-up to r16-1652-g0606d2b979f401, implements middle-end
optimizations (e.g., constant folding) for our trigonometric pi-based function
built-ins.
This patch is part of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20250607/4a4a9cb6/attachment.obj
Please take a look
Hi all,
This patch, a follow-up to r16-1652-g0606d2b979f401, implements middle-end
optimizations (e.g., constant folding) for our trigonometric pi-based function
built-ins.
This patch is part of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20250607/4a4a9cb6/attachment.obj
Please take a look
Hi Jerry,
for the moment only the static library is configured in the build scripts.
Therefore only that is build named libcaf_shmem.a That's completely correct
and desired.
I have asked the same question about performance or stress tests and got
only the coarray_icar (link in the 0/6 mail).
On 6/26/25 12:22 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi Jerry,
thanks for testing. I have fixed IMO most of the whitespace issues in the
patch attached to this mail:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-June/062349.html
About the 32 vs. 64 bit versions of the libraries: I never got in touch with
Hi,
I found a bug in the module cleanup expression at the end of the test. In the
attached patch it is corrected.
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
Andre
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:48:11 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Antony Lewis reported this
Hi Andre,
I used a clean build directory but don't recall if I reconfigured. I was 10
minutes away from leaving for the airport! I'll try again when I am back at
base.
Please, everyone else, don't hesitate to review and test.
Regards
Paul
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, 23:47 Andre Vehreschild, wrote:
Hi Harald,
thanks for the review. Pushed all three parts as gcc-16-1698-g24940ad1534.
A backport to gcc-15 of the first part of the patch, aka this one, seems to be
feasible. I'd like to give the patch a bit time to mature here in gcc-16 and
backport in about a week, when I do not forget it.
Tha
Hi Thomas,
> I have a few questions.
>
> First, I see that your patch series does not use gfortran's descriptors
> for accessing coarrays via shared memory, as the original work by
> Nicolas did. Can you comment on that?
The ABI for invoking coarray functionality is sufficient for doing the job
Hi Jerry,
thanks for testing. I have fixed IMO most of the whitespace issues in the
patch attached to this mail:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-June/062349.html
About the 32 vs. 64 bit versions of the libraries: I never got in touch with
that. I am doing the same as for caf_single. In
15 matches
Mail list logo
