Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR104684, v1] Fix gimple error when pointer assigning alloc array.

Hi Andre, Am 04.03.25 um 17:11 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi all, attached patch fixes a gimplification fault when a pointer assignment to an allocatable array is done. The tree type is different, because of that flag in the lang_specific structure. View-converting the type fixes the issue. Re

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119049 and 119074, external prototypes with different arglists

Hi Andre, while the patch looks ok to me, why did you not choose to generate a "22.7.2 Variable-Length Parameter Lists" https://www.gnu.org/software/c-intro-and-ref/manual/html_node/Variable-Number-of-Arguments.html when the arguments differ? Then its the callee responsibility to figure stuff

Re: GCC GSoC 2025: Call for project ideas and mentors

Hello everyone, I am pleased that I can announce that we have been accepted to be a GSoC mentoring organization also in 2025!. This also means that students are now really starting to look at our idea page and so if anyone wants to add a project, it is still possible but we should not delay it mu

[Fortran, Patch, PR104684, v1] Fix gimple error when pointer assigning alloc array.

Hi all, attached patch fixes a gimplification fault when a pointer assignment to an allocatable array is done. The tree type is different, because of that flag in the lang_specific structure. View-converting the type fixes the issue. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline? Reg

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR103391, v1] Fix gimple error on assign to pointer array.

Hi Paul, thanks for the review. Committed as gcc-15-7812-g04909c7ecc0. Yes please: you do the backport. Thank you very much. I am looking at pr104684 at the moment, which is the last regression on my list (i.e. that I am assigned or cc'ed to). When the regression test for this is fine, I will co

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR103391, v1] Fix gimple error on assign to pointer array.

Hi Andre, You beat me to it! I had just noticed the missing indirect reference. Yes, this is good for mainline and backporting to 14-branch at very least. Thanks for the patch. If you want to do the push to mainline, I will do the backporting if you like? I'll not be back at base for a little whi

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119049 and 119074, external prototypes with different arglists

Hi Thomas, Am 03.03.25 um 22:50 schrieb Thomas Koenig: Hello world, this patch is a bit more complicated than originally envisioned. The problem was that we were not handling external dummy arguments with -fc-prototypes-external. In looking at this, I found that we were not warning about exter

[Fortran, Patch, PR103391, v1] Fix gimple error on assign to pointer array.

Hi all, attached patch fixes a 12-regression when an assignment to a pointer array is done. The issue was a missing indirect ref on assign as it was already done for allocatable arrays. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline? Regards, Andre -- Andre Vehreschild * Email

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR77872, v1] Fix ICE when getting caf-token from abstract class type.

Hi Steve, thanks for the review. Committed as gcc-15-7804-g5bd66483839. Thanks again, Andre On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 12:34:49 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:24PM +0100, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > > > attached patches fix a 12-regression, when a caf token is reques

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119049 and 119074, external prototypes with different arglists

Hi Thomas, while the patch looks ok to me, why did you not choose to generate a "22.7.2 Variable-Length Parameter Lists" https://www.gnu.org/software/c-intro-and-ref/manual/html_node/Variable-Number-of-Arguments.html when the arguments differ? Then its the callee responsibility to figure stuff o