Hi Paul,
thanks for the review. Committed as gcc-15-7812-g04909c7ecc0.
Yes please: you do the backport. Thank you very much.
I am looking at pr104684 at the moment, which is the last regression on my list
(i.e. that I am assigned or cc'ed to). When the regression test for this is
fine, I will continue with the coarray teams stuff. If you find any regressions
I have caused or you don't find the solution for, just add me to cc.
Thanks again,
Andre
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:46:33 +0000
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> You beat me to it! I had just noticed the missing indirect reference. Yes,
> this is good for mainline and backporting to 14-branch at very least.
>
> Thanks for the patch. If you want to do the push to mainline, I will do the
> backporting if you like? I'll not be back at base for a little while so
> there will be a suitable delay.
> I have several Steinmetz sourced regression fixes to bring to the list in
> the next days.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 12:02, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > attached patch fixes a 12-regression when an assignment to a pointer array
> > is
> > done. The issue was a missing indirect ref on assign as it was already
> > done for
> > allocatable arrays.
> >
> > Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
> > --
> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> >
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
