Re: [fluid-dev] Another application using FluidSynth announced

2011-09-18 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Sunday 18 September 2011, Peter Hanappe wrote: > > > Second draft. I'd like an ok from both Pedro's and Peter before I put it > > up as an "official project standpoint". > > You've got my ok. > > Cheers, > P Mine too. Regards, Pedro ___ fluid-dev

Re: [fluid-dev] Another application using FluidSynth announced

2011-09-18 Thread Peter Hanappe
Second draft. I'd like an ok from both Pedro's and Peter before I put it up as an "official project standpoint". You've got my ok. Cheers, P // David ___ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/flui

[fluid-dev] Should playback_callback receive MIDI file events?

2011-09-18 Thread Matt Giuca
This continues a discussion started in the bug ticket #101 ( https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/ticket/101) (between myself and David Henningson). Recently, a feature was added allowing the user of the FS API to register a custom playback_callback function, which is called every time a M

Re: [fluid-dev] Fast renderer end of track

2011-09-18 Thread Matt Giuca
> > Fixing it on the FluidSynth side seems ugly to me: What if EOT occurs with > a everlasting note on? What about time to let the reverb decay after > playing? > > The issue has been brought up before, and I vaguely remember that I saw > some other implementation had added a parameter, something

Re: [fluid-dev] Fast renderer end of track

2011-09-18 Thread David Henningsson
On 09/13/2011 04:05 PM, Matt Giuca wrote: I finally got around to looking at this issue (thought I'd take a break from arguing about licensing and actually contribute!) It turns out this issue is really easy to "fix", but much harder to *really* fix. To elaborate: 1. To "fix" the issue, all I h

Re: [fluid-dev] Another application using FluidSynth announced

2011-09-18 Thread David Henningsson
On 09/15/2011 09:12 AM, Matt Giuca wrote: Would the following text be suitable to put on the wiki, and represent the sort-of consensus: === iOS and the App Store === It is questionable whether iOS and the App Store can fulfil the requirements of the LGPL. From a long thread

Re: [fluid-dev] Another application using FluidSynth announced

2011-09-18 Thread David Henningsson
On 09/15/2011 09:03 AM, David Henningsson wrote: On 09/15/2011 05:52 AM, Matt Giuca wrote: Note: I'm not trying to suggest taking action here. I think we've kind of reached a consensus that the LGPL will remain on FluidSynth and the developers won't actively pursue violations, but that perhaps t