On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 05:52:12 -0400 "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook"
wrote:
>
> It would appear that on Aug 1, Michael Jennings did say:
>
> > On Sunday, 31 July 2011, at 18:04:46 (+0100),
> > Steve Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I'm with Paul on this one.
> >
> > This is incorrect. Adding reply-to is bad beh
It would appear that on Aug 1, Michael Jennings did say:
> On Sunday, 31 July 2011, at 18:04:46 (+0100),
> Steve Jones wrote:
>
> > I'm with Paul on this one.
>
> This is incorrect. Adding reply-to is bad behavior. Here's why:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> The most
On Mon 01 August 2011 23:04:23 Wido did opine thusly:
>
> Ok, this must be the dumbest thread ever
>
>
> Don't mean to be an assbut just for a moment, follow my thoughs
>
> For the time beeing, enlightenment is not a WM that casual users
> choose to be with. And from those who does, not eve
2011/8/2 Thomas Gstädtner :
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 03:19, Michael Jennings wrote:
>> On Sunday, 31 July 2011, at 18:04:46 (+0100),
>> Steve Jones wrote:
>>
>>> I'm with Paul on this one.
>>
>> This is incorrect. Adding reply-to is bad behavior. Here's why:
>>
>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 03:19, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday, 31 July 2011, at 18:04:46 (+0100),
> Steve Jones wrote:
>
>> I'm with Paul on this one.
>
> This is incorrect. Adding reply-to is bad behavior. Here's why:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> The most important
Ok, this must be the dumbest thread ever
Don't mean to be an assbut just for a moment, follow my thoughs
For the time beeing, enlightenment is not a WM that casual users choose to
be with. And from those who does, not everybody is submitted to this list.
No, I don't have evidence, just comm
2011/8/1 Michael Jennings :
> On Sunday, 31 July 2011, at 18:04:46 (+0100),
> Steve Jones wrote:
>
>> I'm with Paul on this one.
>
> This is incorrect. Adding reply-to is bad behavior. Here's why:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> The most important reason being that it becom
On Sunday, 31 July 2011, at 18:04:46 (+0100),
Steve Jones wrote:
> I'm with Paul on this one.
This is incorrect. Adding reply-to is bad behavior. Here's why:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The most important reason being that it becomes essentially impossible
for most e-mail c
Yeah, I did it AFTER raster fixed it.
But it's weird that it works with some emails and doesn't work with
the other emails :(
I don't see the difference. All mail headers are set correctly.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> It would appear
It would appear that on Aug 1, Daniel Juyung Seo did say:
> Thanks raster, but gmail still didn't work right with this.
> Anybody knows how to configure gmail?
Hmmnn, just a thought, are you testing this with a reply to a message
posted _AFTER_ raster reset the mailman admin interface???
I ask
Thanks raster, but gmail still didn't work right with this.
Anybody knows how to configure gmail?
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:43:17 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
> said:
>
> already did.
>
>> +1
>> raster, please set this c
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:43:17 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo said:
already did.
> +1
> raster, please set this correctly!
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
> On Aug 1, 2011 10:32 AM, "Kaizoku" wrote:
> >
> > Am 01.08.2011 um 01:17 schrieb PaulTT:
> >
> >> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the
+1
raster, please set this correctly!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Aug 1, 2011 10:32 AM, "Kaizoku" wrote:
>
> Am 01.08.2011 um 01:17 schrieb PaulTT:
>
>> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
>> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
>>
Am 01.08.2011 um 01:17 schrieb PaulTT:
> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
> the original sender and not the list...
>
> i think it's a misconfiguration
>
not only in gmail, same here & I
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:17:45 +0200 PaulTT said:
this USED to be set i am sure. something changed i quite a while ago.
> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
> the original sender and not the l
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 18:04:46 Steve Jones wrote:
> On 07/31/2011 05:19 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> > 2011/7/31 PaulTT:
> >> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
> >> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
> >> the original sende
On 07/31/2011 05:19 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> 2011/7/31 PaulTT:
>> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
>> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
>> the original sender and not the list...
>>
>> i think it's a misconfiguration
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
> 2011/7/31 PaulTT :
>> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
>> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
>> the original sender and not the list...
>>
>> i think it's a miscon
2011/7/31 PaulTT :
> it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
> -deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
> the original sender and not the list...
>
> i think it's a misconfiguration
>
Just reply to all.
> bye
>
> --
it seems that Reply-To is not correctly set for the lists (-users and
-deve), so anytime i click on reply, in gmail, the mail is headed to
the original sender and not the list...
i think it's a misconfiguration
bye
--
Go
20 matches
Mail list logo
