Just a quick note:-)
If you don't have Eterm installed you can you
alt-esc to get the exebuf and from there you can run whatever you like,
xterm maybe!
\\troback
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:06:21 -0600
Michael Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Open a terminal (as Massimo suggested, ctrl+alt+inse
Laurence Vanek wrote:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:35:20 -0500 Laurence Vanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> babbled:
>>
>>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:47:16 -0500 Laurence Vanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
you
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:35:20 -0500 Laurence Vanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:47:16 -0500 Laurence Vanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > you dont way what the issue is. i am guessing it is that the apps dont
> > start
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:03:07 +1000 Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
for those with the problems:
http://www.enlightenment.org/Main/Debugging/
if you want to help.
> Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have some question about a very strange thing with e17. Does anyone
> >
Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some question about a very strange thing with e17. Does anyone
> experience any problems using xmms and e17 at the same time on system
> based on glibc 2.4 ?
I've been using glibc-2.4 since whenever it arrived in the unstable (
~x86 ) branch of Gento
Oliver Pahl wrote:
> I have the same problem with glibc-2.3.6 so it cant be glibc-2.4 related
>
> regards
>
> Oli
>
>
>
> Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 13:27 +0200, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have some question about a very strange thing with e17. Doe
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:47:16 -0500 Laurence Vanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> you dont way what the issue is. i am guessing it is that the apps dont start -
> but you havent given any logs or other info :)
My apologies.
Correct, apps dont start but
I have the same problem with glibc-2.3.6 so it cant be glibc-2.4 related
regards
Oli
Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 13:27 +0200, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some question about a very strange thing with e17. Does anyone
>> experience any problems usi
Open a terminal (as Massimo suggested, ctrl+alt+insert) and check your
~/.e/e/applications/menu/all folder and see if any .eap files are
listed. There should at least be a few default ones there. Then you
can edit the ~/.e/e/applications/menu/favorite/.order file using nano,
gedit, kwrite, e
> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 13:27 +0200, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
>
>> For those how want to try to reproduce this bug on others systems (glibc
>> 2.3.6 for instance).
>>
>
> I don't know if you meant this to be tested, but on my machine e17 +
> xmms 1.2.10 and glibc 2.3.5 everything is wor
Jeremiah Foster, il 22/08/2006 17:28, scrisse:
> Hello all,
>
> I have used apt-get to install enlightenment and am looking forward to
> using it. How do I get a terminal when enlightenment first comes up?
in both e16 and e17 the keybinding ctrl+alt+ins is bounded to an
Eterm window.
> I have tr
Dustin Jenkins wrote:
> Manuel Werlberger wrote:
>
>> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cool, excellent. Strange is right, I thought those entries in
>>> /etc/apt/preferences were pretty specific and made sense, but perhaps
>>> they were interfering. Anyway, well done.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Manuel Werlberger wrote:
> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>
>
>> Cool, excellent. Strange is right, I thought those entries in
>> /etc/apt/preferences were pretty specific and made sense, but perhaps
>> they were interfering. Anyway, well done.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> As expected the entries in /etc/apt/p
Hello all,
I have used apt-get to install enlightenment and am looking forward to
using it. How do I get a terminal when enlightenment first comes up?
I have tried various left and right clicking in various places but there
seems to be no menu that will let me run commands or open applications.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:20:53 +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> The menu spec is a huge monstosity, not all of it is supported yet, but
> will be eventually. The largest parts that are not currently supported
> involve deletions, movements, and other changes.
You're too polite. It's a mess! Personally
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:12:27 + (UTC) "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:03:06 +1000, David Seikel wrote:
>
> snip...
> >
> > NOTE: I am still in the process of making these big, sweeping
> > changes. All of the big pieces are there now. Expect lots of
> > tweaking,
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:03:06 +1000, David Seikel wrote:
snip...
>
> NOTE: I am still in the process of making these big, sweeping changes. All
> of the big pieces are there now. Expect lots of tweaking, polishing,
> optimising, etc.
Excellent! I assume, ultimately, that the "Create Icon" functi
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:46:27 + (UTC) "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:35:11 +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> >
> > Both bar and menu directories have moved, although the bar ones
> > moved a long time ago.
> >
> > applications/bar/default is where ibar stores its files
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:35:11 +1000, David Seikel wrote:
>
> Both bar and menu directories have moved, although the bar ones moved a
> long time ago.
>
> applications/bar/default is where ibar stores its files now.
>
> applications/menu/favorite is where the favorite menu stores its files
> now.
19 matches
Mail list logo
