Hi Youling,
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 09:32 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out that there is no need to mask the lower 32 bits
> here.
>
> It can be modified as follows,
> --- a/backends/loongarch_initreg.c
> +++ b/backends/loongarch_initreg.c
> @@ -79,11 +79,8 @@ loongarch_set_init
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while building
elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/63
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: de857968a715d1317b1686d2416b28ffe402dc09
Worker: gentoo-sparc
A restored build has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/64
Build state: build successful
Revision: fd16a21a1ac7c999194cb75f473c4fcab76dabe8
Worker: gentoo-sparc
Bu
Hi,
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 10:20 +, builder--- via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while
> building elfutils.
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/63
>
> Build state: fai
This patch implements the set_initial_registers_tid hook for LoongArch.
Signed-off-by: Liwei Ge
Signed-off-by: Youling Tang
---
backends/ChangeLog | 6 +++
backends/Makefile.am | 2 +-
backends/loongarch_init.c| 1 +
backends/loongarch_initreg.c | 88 +++
Hi,
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 19:20 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> This patch implements the set_initial_registers_tid hook for LoongArch.
Thanks for the update. Looks good.
Pushed,
Mark
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while building
elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/67
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: e65bbdde97f4094274dbdc327147e9cfe1fcc9a0
Worker: gentoo-sparc
Hi,
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 12:05 +, builder--- via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while
> building elfutils.
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/67
>
> Build state: fai
Hi,
On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 16:12 +0800, Ying Huang wrote:
> From: Ying Huang
>
> In mips64 little-endian, r_info consists of four byte fields(contains
> three reloc types) and a 32-bit symbol index. In order to adapt
> GELF_R_SYM and GELF_R_TYPE, need convert raw data to get correct symbol
> inde
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30378
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30316
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
A restored build has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/68
Build state: build successful
Revision: d16628bb7dc39a020e555e16bf56374fdac84e42
Worker: gentoo-sparc
Bu
On Montag, 8. Mai 2023 14:33:57 CEST Serhei Makarov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I wanted to open up public discussion on a project I'm looking to
> develop in elfutils, tentatively named eu-stacktrace. I've started to
> write code on branch users/serhei/eu-stacktrace.
>
> eu-stacktrace will be a util
Hello elfutils developers,
I tried to use elfutils to retrieve the backtrace within a signal handle,
but I am having a segfault inside `dwfl_module_getsrc`.
*Here is my code:*
Dwfl_Callbacks proc_callbacks;
proc_callbacks.find_debuginfo = dwfl_standard_find_debuginfo,
proc_callbacks.debuginfo_pat
Hi -
> I tried to use elfutils to retrieve the backtrace within a signal handle,
> but I am having a segfault inside `dwfl_module_getsrc`.
> [...]
A red flag is "within a signal handler". The kinds of code that one
may safely invoke in a signal handler are highly limited. Most
elfutils function
15 matches
Mail list logo
