[PATCH 1/4] Add missing tests to .gitignore

2017-02-10 Thread Ulf Hermann
Some test binaries were missing and showed up in "git status". Signed-off-by: Ulf Hermann --- .gitignore | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index c583347..0ee3af7 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ Makefile.in /test

[PATCH 2/4] Make the backtrace-data test helper more robust

2017-02-10 Thread Ulf Hermann
When unwinding by frame pointer the unwinder might ask for invalid addresses. We don't have to fail the test in this case. In fact any broken dwarf information can lead to requests for invalid addresses, also without frame pointer unwinding. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hermann --- tests/ChangeLog

[PATCH 3/4] Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests

2017-02-10 Thread Ulf Hermann
This is useful to test unwinding without debug information. The binaries being examined might still have frame pointers that allow us to bridge the unknown symbols. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hermann --- tests/ChangeLog | 6 ++ tests/backtrace-subr.sh | 14 ++ tests/backtrace.c

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests

2017-02-10 Thread Ulf Hermann
Hi, I have another patch here, that introduces the actual feature; a fallback mode for unwinding by frame pointer if unwinding by cfi fails. Unfortunately your mail server thinks it's spam, presumably because of the inline test binaries. What can I do about that? br, Ulf Hermann

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests

2017-02-10 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 15:25 +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote: > I have another patch here, that introduces the actual feature; a > fallback mode for unwinding by frame pointer if unwinding by cfi > fails. That sounds like a useful feature! > Unfortunately your mail server thinks it's spam, presumably bec

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests

2017-02-10 Thread Ulf Hermann
Unfortunately your mail server thinks it's spam, presumably because of the inline test binaries. What can I do about that? Do you have the bounce message, then we can investigate. Otherwise could you post the patch without the test binaries? Then we get them some other way. The bounce message

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests

2017-02-10 Thread Ulf Hermann
Try sending suspicious content via something like fpaste.org. I don't think it's very suspicious, but I don't intend to start a pointless argument as first thing I do here ;) fpaste.org won't accept it either, but paste.kde.org does. So, here we go: https://paste.kde.org/pgs6oqk2z br, Ulf