On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 15:25 +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote: > I have another patch here, that introduces the actual feature; a > fallback mode for unwinding by frame pointer if unwinding by cfi > fails.
That sounds like a useful feature! > Unfortunately your mail server thinks it's spam, presumably because of > the inline test binaries. What can I do about that? Do you have the bounce message, then we can investigate. Otherwise could you post the patch without the test binaries? Then we get them some other way. Although I am surprised the mailinglist rejects the output of git send-email. It really shouldn't, so having the bounce message would be good (we can then discuss on overseers@... to see what really happened). Thanks, Mark
