On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:37:51PM -0800, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:29 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > static const Ebl_Register_Location prstatus_regs[] =
> > >{
> > > -{ .offset = 8, .regno = 1, .count = 31, .bits = 64 } /* x1..x31 */
> > > +{ .offset = BITS/8, .reg
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:29 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I don't really like adding code that cannot be tested. But it does look
> the 32-bit port isn't far off, just waiting for the next linux/glibc
> release to settle the time_t ABI. And the code does look correct.
> Except for...
We don't expect
On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 15:27 -0800, Jim Wilson wrote:
> This conflicts with the previoues two patches. Adds 32-bit support exactly
> the
> same way that the sparc backend handles 32- and 64-bit core file support. The
> 64-bit core file support was tested and still works same as before.
I don't r
