On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:29 PM Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote:
> I don't really like adding code that cannot be tested. But it does look
> the 32-bit port isn't far off, just waiting for the next linux/glibc
> release to settle the time_t ABI. And the code does look correct.
> Except for...
We don't expect 32-bit desktop linux distros, but there are folks that
want 32-bit embedded linux. A few companies have gotten it working,
but only Andes is trying to upstream patches so far, and as you
mentioned that is waiting for the time_t ABI. Meanwhile, it should be
possible to build a busy-box style 32-bit linux system, using an old
obsolete pre-upstream glibc port, but that isn't useful for real
development work.
> > static const Ebl_Register_Location prstatus_regs[] =
> > {
> > - { .offset = 8, .regno = 1, .count = 31, .bits = 64 } /* x1..x31 */
> > + { .offset = BITS/8, .regno = 1, .count = 31, .bits = 64 } /* x1..x31 */
> > };
>
> Should that be .bits = BITS ?
Yes, sorry, I was looking at the offset field and completely missed
the bits member at the end. Do you want me to submit an updated
patch?
Jim
