https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler ---
> This wouldn't have happened if the service had been using their
> already-deployed pgsql instance.
I see what you mean - though whatever growing storage would have to have been
allocated at that dat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Durigan Junior ---
I can't speak on their behalf, but I would guess that they already have an
existing PostgreSQL (e.g.) deployment that's well integrated into their
infrastructure, and they don't want to have to man
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment
