Filed as issue 250118.1:
https://dwarfstd.org/issues/250118.1.html
-cary
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:45 AM David Blaikie wrote:
> +1, thanks for bringing this up, Tom - seems like just specing it as class
> "constant" would be fine. And in fact in table 7.5 it's already specified
> that way...
+1, thanks for bringing this up, Tom - seems like just specing it as class
"constant" would be fine. And in fact in table 7.5 it's already specified
that way...
So might just be a matter of removing the leb128 wording from the quoted
area?
@Cary Coutant could we get an issue filed for this?
On M
> "John" == John DelSignore writes:
John> Is the discriminant value always a constant? Perhaps DWARF should say,
John> "The value of this attribute is of class constant." Table 2.3 defines
John> attribute class constant as, "One, two, four, eight or sixteen bytes
John> of uninterpreted data,
Is the discriminant value always a constant? Perhaps DWARF should say, "The
value of this attribute is of class constant." Table 2.3 defines attribute
class constant as, "One, two, four, eight or sixteen bytes of uninterpreted
data, or data encoded in the variable length format known as LEB128 (
