Filed as issue 250118.1: https://dwarfstd.org/issues/250118.1.html
-cary On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:45 AM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, thanks for bringing this up, Tom - seems like just specing it as class > "constant" would be fine. And in fact in table 7.5 it's already specified > that way... > So might just be a matter of removing the leb128 wording from the quoted > area? > > @Cary Coutant <ccout...@gmail.com> could we get an issue filed for this? > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 4:32 PM Tom Tromey via Dwarf-discuss < > dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote: > >> >>>>> "John" == John DelSignore <jdelsign...@perforce.com> writes: >> >> John> Is the discriminant value always a constant? Perhaps DWARF should >> say, >> John> "The value of this attribute is of class constant." Table 2.3 >> defines >> John> attribute class constant as, "One, two, four, eight or sixteen bytes >> John> of uninterpreted data, or data encoded in the variable length format >> John> known as LEB128 (see Section 7.6 on page 221).". >> >> Yeah, makes sense to me. >> What I meant by: >> >> >> Additionally there doesn't seem to be any >> >> reason to limit the forms that may be used here. >> >> ... is that any constant form seems fine. >> >> Tom >> -- >> Dwarf-discuss mailing list >> Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org >> https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss >> >
-- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
