Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 Hangs with Radeon 8500

2003-07-15 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 16:23 schrieb Marci: > Hi all , > > I'm tring UT2003 with my Raddy 8500LE and lastest DRI Drivers , but I have > problems. > > The game start correctly , and I can play for an undeterminated period of > time that can be 30 seconds or a couple of minutes, after that perio

[Dri-devel] UT2003 Hangs with Radeon 8500

2003-07-15 Thread Marci
Hi all , I'm tring UT2003 with my Raddy 8500LE and lastest DRI Drivers , but I have problems. The game start correctly , and I can play for an undeterminated period of time that can be 30 seconds or a couple of minutes, after that period the system hangsand I can hear only the sound of the ga

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-21 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:05:27PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES* > > ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even > > if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture > > yourself like that?!?

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-21 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:33:56PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > Philip Armstrong wrote: > >phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo >./ut2003_demo > >Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". > Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do > full

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
> There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES* > ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even > if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture > yourself like that?!? :) FWIW, the Windows version of UT2003 even runs (badly) on Intel 810

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Ian Romanick
Leif Delgass wrote: Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner registers, but it's not implemented in the driver yet (I don't have hardware docs myself so I don't know the specifics of what the c

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Ian Romanick
Philip Armstrong wrote: phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo >./ut2003_demo Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do fullscreen. Either the XFree86 way or the XiG way. [ 4] /usr/X11R6/lib/mo

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
> Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't > supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner That's a no go as we rely on this extension. The game should probably assert in this case. -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc. ---

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:13:01PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > > > [ 6] /usr/X11R6/lib/modules-dri-trunk/dri/mga_dri.so [0x43f31fb7] > > > > [ 7] /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo/System/OpenGLDrv.so(DrawPrimitive__ > > > > 22FOpenGLRenderInterface14EPrimitiveType+0x373) > > Might be interesting t

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:53:25PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:25:16PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > > is purported to n

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > > > is purported to not need

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v220

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > > is purported to not need S3TC extensi

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Brown
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > is purported to not need S3TC extensions), I get the following > traceback reported by

[Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
This is pretty much a followup to Adam Kirchhoff's bug report. Adam reported that UT2003 patch level 2186 failed with the latest dri trunk on his Radeon 8500 and gave the traceback reported by UT2003. I've noticed that more information is contained within ~/.ut2003/System/UT2003.log Using the deb

[Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
This is pretty much a followup to Adam Kirchhoff's bug report. Adam reported that UT2003 patch level 2186 failed with the latest dri trunk on his Radeon 8500 and gave the traceback reported by UT2003. I've noticed that more information is contained within ~/.ut2003/System/UT2003.log Using the deb

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003

2003-02-05 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Ian Romanick wrote: > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > FYI, > > > > With the latest patch to UT2003 (2186), and drivers from the > > texmem branch as of this morning (for a Radeon 8500), ut2003 segfaults: > > > > Backtrace: > > [ 1] ./Core.so [0x409f635a] > > [ 2] /lib/libpth

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003

2003-02-05 Thread Ian Romanick
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: FYI, With the latest patch to UT2003 (2186), and drivers from the texmem branch as of this morning (for a Radeon 8500), ut2003 segfaults: Backtrace: [ 1] ./Core.so [0x409f635a] [ 2] /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x40d7275a] [ 3] /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40b9f898] [ 4] /usr/X11R6/li

[Dri-devel] UT2003

2003-02-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
FYI, With the latest patch to UT2003 (2186), and drivers from the texmem branch as of this morning (for a Radeon 8500), ut2003 segfaults: Backtrace: [ 1] ./Core.so [0x409f635a] [ 2] /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x40d7275a] [ 3] /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40b9f898] [ 4] /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r20