On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:32:10PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:21:42PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Michael wrote:
> > > >On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:21:42PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Michael wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > >
> > >>So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All
> >
>
> Yeah, drivers/ati/radeon_reg.h says that, but the kernel uses
> radeon_drv.h, which has 0x1c50?
>
> So you're still emitting to 0x1c50, which is either fine and it always
> has been, or it's still buggy.
OK, I've gone back and looked at the docs and the radeon_reg.h value is
incorrect, th
Michael wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>>
>>>
So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All
going nicely & found one stupid bug alr
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> >On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All
> >>going nicely & found one stupid bug already.
> >>
> >
> >I'm strug
Michael wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All
>>going nicely & found one stupid bug already.
>>
>
> I'm struggling to see what the dyslexic bug is? It just looked like one of
> the head
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All
> going nicely & found one stupid bug already.
I'm struggling to see what the dyslexic bug is? It just looked like one of
the header files was wrong (but if yo
From: Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:59:23 +0100
I haven't proven whether these are all restore-context changes, or if some
additional bogus statechanges are emitted later on. Either way, it's easy to
see room for improvement...
In viewperf thes
So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All going
nicely & found one stupid bug already.
One thing it does is keep track of values emitted to each register to see
if/when they actually change (as opposed to just emitting the old one again on
top of itself).
I've had
