Hello
Any news regarding this issue?
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core a
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
Rafał Miłecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
- This appears to fix some of the graphical corruption issues i've been having.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index ebc9532..a11a0dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/d
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:06:14 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > (cc jbarnes)
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:50:38 +0200
> > Roel Kluin wrote:
> >
> > > dev_priv->saveSWF1 is a 16 element array, but this reads up to
> > > index 22
> > >
> > > S
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
--- Comment #4 from Michael S. Tsirkin 2009-08-02
22:49:49 ---
Opened a bug in freedesktop.org bugzilla - maybe this way
someone will look at it?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23096
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kerne
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2009-08-02 15:31:27 PST ---
Are you sure you're actually using the latest drm and mesa? I can't reproduce
any regression with glxgears here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13896
> Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 broke expect and gcc's testsuite
> Submitter : Mikael Pettersson
> Date : 2009-07-29 11:00 (5 days old)
> References: http://ma
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please l
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
--- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher 2009-08-02 14:45:13 PST ---
The flickering has nothing to do with irq support.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
--- Comment #1 from Rafał Miłecki 2009-08-02 13:45:43 PST
---
Videos:
http://sirius.cs.put.poznan.pl/~inf80100/mesa/out-1.ogv
http://sirius.cs.put.poznan.pl/~inf80100/mesa/out-2.ogv
http://sirius.cs.put.poznan.pl/~inf80100/mesa/out-3.ogv
Bug
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
Summary: RV620+DRI: broken glxgears [bisected]
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:12:18 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Pekka Paalanen skrev:
> > From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Thomas Hellstrom
> > Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
> >
Pekka Paalanen skrev:
> From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Hellstrom
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
>
> On some architectures the comparison may cause a compilation failure.
>
>From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
On some architectures the comparison may cause a compilation failure.
Original partial fix Signed-off-
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Corollary the TTM priority stuff is i believe a wrong idea
> for radeon (could be usefull for others GPU but i don't have
> such feeling). So i would like to be able to disable it and
> move the knowledge in radeon kernel driver, here is my thinking
> on that :
>
>
The TTM
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:31 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:12 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:05 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:12 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:05 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:05 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glisse
> > > > w
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glisse
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Corollary the TTM priority stuff is i believ
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glisse
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Corollary the TTM priority stuff is i believe a wrong idea
> > > for radeon (could be usefull for others GPU but
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > I am working on improving 2D performances in KMS world and
> > i am starting to think that we don't need the split btw
> > read/write domain but only need one domain. My thinking is
> >
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >
> > I am working on patch to exercise this, i am especialy
> > interested in performances improvement we can have in
> > application which routinely call getimage for rendering,
> > suc
23 matches
Mail list logo
