[Bug 17196] [GEM] a lot of glean cases run failed

2008-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17196 --- Comment #3 from Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-25 23:16:16 PST --- Fixed an issue with G965 in 0793456076f8356f1b7fb99e0b76b8e3d1eeb74a in the kernel that would have manifested in drawpix failing. Also, please include kernel sha1

[PATCH] new chip name is GM45

2008-08-25 Thread Jesse Barnes
Author: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i915: official name for GM45 chipset Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index a82b487..71326ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/dr

[PATCH] separate i915 suspend/resume functions into their own file

2008-08-25 Thread Jesse Barnes
[Patch against drm-next. Consider this a trial balloon for our new Linux development model.] This is a big chunk of code. Separating it out makes it easier to change without churn on the main i915_drv.c file (and there will be churn as we fix bugs and add things like kernel mode setting). Also

[Bug 17085] [GEM] PAT breaks GEM with "*ERROR* Failed to map ringbuffer"

2008-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17085 Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Load framebuffer driver with fbcon!

2008-08-25 Thread Zhao, Chunfeng
Hi Daniel, Is it okay to disable the VT and only enable the fbcon and FBdev driver? Thanks! Chunfeng -Original Message- From: Daniel Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:34 AM To: Zhao, Chunfeng Cc: Keith Packard; Michel Dänzer; Kristian Høgsberg; dri-devel Subj

[Bug 16982] Problems with DRM on G33 chipset

2008-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982 --- Comment #4 from Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-25 10:23:37 PST --- I have committed the drm updates to -CURRENT and a patch set is available for RELENG_7 at http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland. Please, see how that works. robe

Re: New ATI 780G IGP Support

2008-08-25 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Carlos Linares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all. I've just gotten a motherboard with the AMD 780G chipset with > integrated Radeon 3200 graphics. I can't get dri to work under > netbsd-current amd64 or ubuntu 8.04 desktop edition i386. I tried some minor

New ATI 780G IGP Support

2008-08-25 Thread Carlos Linares
Hello all. I've just gotten a motherboard with the AMD 780G chipset with integrated Radeon 3200 graphics. I can't get dri to work under netbsd-current amd64 or ubuntu 8.04 desktop edition i386. I tried some minor tweaking to the netbsd dri sources (which are lagging a bit behind dri head) af

Re: Load framebuffer driver with fbcon!

2008-08-25 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Zhao, Chunfeng wrote: > We want to load the frame buffer driver on a platform without VBIOS, is it > okay to build fbcon and framebuffer driver as modules and load them? > > When we try to build the fbcon into the kernel it will require VGA and VT. Works

Load framebuffer driver with fbcon!

2008-08-25 Thread Zhao, Chunfeng
Hi, We want to load the frame buffer driver on a platform without VBIOS, is it okay to build fbcon and framebuffer driver as modules and load them? When we try to build the fbcon into the kernel it will require VGA and VT. Thanks! Chunfeng --

Re: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27 final

2008-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:57 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this. > > > > > > None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO > > > F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, t

Re: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27 final

2008-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:57 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this. > > > > None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO > > F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, to a fragile subsystem that > > has historically easily introduced

Re: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27 final

2008-08-25 Thread Dave Airlie
> > > > Your reply now serves as place to point people at when they ask why Red > > Hat/Fedora ships features that they can't get for 1-6 months, and I'm fine > > with that. > > 6 months sounds too long, there's at least one merge window in such a > time-frame. Not every distro rebases their k