On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:57 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this. > > > > > > None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO > > > F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, to a fragile subsystem that > > > has historically easily introduced new regressions. > > > > > > Can you please make a branch with ONLY REGRESSIONS, or fixes for major > > > problems that don't introduce several thousand lines of new code? > > > > > > Because you seem to be constantly unable to understand what "merge > > > window" > > > means. And I'm not going to take this kind of crap. > > > > I thought you might say that, I'll re-send with just the ones that fix the > > major issues, instead of ones that fix issues people wanted fixed. Most of > > the real bits were in Rawhide kernels for a few weeks, which tbh kicks the > > ass outta a linux-next/linux-mm test cycle. > > > > Your reply now serves as place to point people at when they ask why Red > > Hat/Fedora ships features that they can't get for 1-6 months, and I'm fine > > with that. > > 6 months sounds too long, there's at least one merge window in such a > time-frame.
Right - just realized its 2*cycle for max latency here. The next cycle also needs to finish before Joe User gets it. /me now goes fetch a nice hot cup of tea and wake up.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
