Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7473
Summary: intel 945gm graphic adapter not detected by i915 drm
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7178
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7265
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-09 11:42 ---
Tryin
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7265
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-09 11:32 ---
Matro
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>Hello,
>
>via_setInit forgot to check drm_alloc's return value, hence caused an oops.
>
>As I thought that via_init_context doesn't check via_setInit's return value, I
>changed it a bit. The original code looks a bit confusing, so took a while to
>see that it did check the r
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-09 10:13 ---
I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Strange. I've also seen the i915 sending false interrupts on its own
> line, though.
Here's the interrupt table with i915 loaded:
~$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 401031 XT-PIC timer
1: 3681
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> I guess you got the wrong commit, and the correct one should be the one
> where Dave adds vblank interrupts. It should be close to the one you
> listed.
I thought I double-checked that it was the right commit, but will check
again.
> If the network sits on the same IRQ l
Hello,
via_setInit forgot to check drm_alloc's return value, hence caused an oops.
As I thought that via_init_context doesn't check via_setInit's return value, I
changed it a bit. The original code looks a bit confusing, so took a while to
see that it did check the return values. With my changes
On 7/8/06, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > I was able to compile r300 from Mesa 6.5 but CVS after that and
> > until now returns:
> >
> > gcc -c -I. -I../../../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common -Iserver
> > -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include/GL/in
Marcus Better wrote:
>It appears to be on a different IRQ:
>~$ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 0: 202574 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 2649 XT-PIC i8042
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 8: 0 XT-PIC rtc
> 9: 0 XT-PIC acp
11 matches
Mail list logo
