Re: DRM_CAS bug with x86_64

2005-08-09 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > GAS choked on the DRM_CAS invocation in ffb_lock.h because > __ret was declared as "int" and so it gets passed in %edx > instead of %dl or %dh as required by the setnz instruction. > I just wrapped the declaration with DRM_

Re: IGP + DRI + xfce4 = Hang.

2005-08-09 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Jerome Glisse wrote: On 8/8/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I have an interesting problem with an HP Pavilion. It's an IGP320M with a Radeon Mobility. DRI works just fine when using WindowMaker or gnome. However, when I try to use xfce4 inste

Re: DRM_CAS bug with x86_64

2005-08-09 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Ian Romanick wrote: >> Bernardo Innocenti wrote: >> >>> GAS choked on the DRM_CAS invocation in ffb_lock.h because >>> __ret was declared as "int" and so it gets passed in %edx >>> instead of %dl or %dh as required by the setn

Re: IGP + DRI + xfce4 = Hang.

2005-08-09 Thread Jerome Glisse
On 8/8/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jerome, > > Thanks for the tip. I updated to not only the latest Mesa cvs and > drm cvs, but the latest xorg cvs. This is a vast improvement, and XFCE4 > works with DRI enabled. But... glxgears segfaults: > > (gdb) run > Starting pr

Re: Radeon RV350 (9550), xorg cvs 29.07.2005

2005-08-09 Thread Michał Pytasz
Hi, On Monday 08 of August 2005 16:37, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > >> module loads fine, e-mail us any kernel messages it produces > >> (should be at least a few) > > > > [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.0 20040925 > > PCI: Unable to reserve mem region #1:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for device

building and running the Xegl server

2005-08-09 Thread Jon Smirl
I am putting together some documentation for building and running the Xegl server. There are three main pages: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/EGL http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Xegl http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Xegl-run Xegl is not ready for prime time yet. There are still big problems in it

Re: IGP + DRI + xfce4 = Hang.

2005-08-09 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Jerome Glisse wrote: On 8/8/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jerome, Thanks for the tip. I updated to not only the latest Mesa cvs and drm cvs, but the latest xorg cvs. This is a vast improvement, and XFCE4 works with DRI enabled. But... glxgears segfaults: (gdb) run

Re: X don't start : any help !

2005-08-09 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Sergio wrote: Definetively not ? However, i don't readed this in the several .def and .cf files of the checkout. And : 1) my new CVS radeon_drv.so contains effectively a lot of AGP, r200, and DRI features, and i compiled (with your useful help !) it really on Solaris 10, with Makefiles which

Re: X don't start : any help !

2005-08-09 Thread Dave Airlie
> > DRI, and therefore hardware accelerated 3D, is *not* supported on Solaris. ^^ re-read and go back to xorg lists... Dave. > > > Definetively not ? However, i don't readed this in the several .def and .cf > files of t

Re: X don't start : any help !

2005-08-09 Thread Sergio
Ian Romanick a écrit : This is not the right forum for general X questions. Try xorg at lists dot freedesktop dot org. I already made this, but ... no idea... DRI, and therefore hardware accelerated 3D, is *not* supported on Solaris. Definetively not ? However, i don't readed this in

Re: X don't start : any help !

2005-08-09 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sergio wrote: > After normal full-install of a recent checkout, the X server don't start > (no xorg.log), and this without enabling either glx nor dri. This is not the right forum for general X questions. Try xorg at lists dot freedesktop dot org.

X don't start : any help !

2005-08-09 Thread Sergio
Hi all, After normal full-install of a recent checkout, the X server don't start (no xorg.log), and this without enabling either glx nor dri. However, with my old Xorg (on Solaris) and my new modules, i still get glxgears (550 fps) and also AGPMode 8 (r200). Only dri i can't get, of course b

Re: Radeon RV350 (9550), xorg cvs 29.07.2005

2005-08-09 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
Hi Michal, (II) RADEON(0): [drm] DRM interface version 1.2 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "pci::01:00.0" (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xc2bfc000 Program terminated with signal SIGKILL, Killed. The program no longer exists. (gdb) bt No stac

DRM_CAS bug with x86_64

2005-08-09 Thread Bernardo Innocenti
Hello, this patch fixes two x86_64 problems in Xorg. These changes should probably be propagated upstream to Mesa and DRM (both lists are in Cc). GAS choked on the DRM_CAS invocation in ffb_lock.h because __ret was declared as "int" and so it gets passed in %edx instead of %dl or %dh as required

Re: Radeon RV350 (9550), xorg cvs 29.07.2005

2005-08-09 Thread Michał Pytasz
Hi, On Tuesday 09 of August 2005 18:04, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > Version of my kernel is gentoo-2.6.12-r7, which is based on 2.6.12.3 > > (exact list of applied patches is here: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/ ) > > I am attaching my kernel configuration. > > I could b

[Bug 4031] Mach64: Mesa does not compile. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lEGL

2005-08-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4031 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 4031] New: Mach64: Mesa does not compile. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lEGL

2005-08-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4031 Summary: Mach64: Mesa does not compile. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find

Re: Radeon RV350 (9550), xorg cvs 29.07.2005

2005-08-09 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ Pytasz wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 09 of August 2005 18:04, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: Version of my kernel is gentoo-2.6.12-r7, which is based on 2.6.12.3 (exact list of applied patches is here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/ ) I am atta