It has been pointed out to me by Andrew and Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
that we do a lot of sleeping in code that probably should reschedule
rather than sleep,radeon_do_wait_for_idle being a prime example, this has
a DRM_UDELAY(1), this messes up audio latencys,
Now I'm not sure that wholesale
Hi. I'm a bit confused about the favored procedure for reporting DRI
bugs. The DRI User Guide, at
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/DRIuserguide.html
is recommended by the DRI wiki as important reading before bringing
up problems. The DRI User Guide, in turn, suggests the Sourceforge bug
databas
Any ideas about what this is? It is from the Redhat -2 xorg rpm's. All of these
programs ran fine on SW mesa and R128 driver.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cairogears]$ ./cairogears -glx COMP
cairogears: r200_cmdbuf.c:295: r200EmitBlit: Assertion `(src_offset & 1023) == 0
' failed.
Aborted
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've just gotten an i865 system are there any docs out there for
> programming the 3d end of this? Intels site for that chipset has no
> programmers reference beyond the datasheet which doesn't say muc
> about 3D
> stuff..
>
> Are these
I got this working. Something is wrong in those rpm's when they overlaid the
-0.5 versions. For example 0.5 has the tls subdir and -2 does not. I whacked my
X11R6 tree and reinstalled from the -2 rpms and everything works. I didn't
spend the time tracking things down but some files that needed to
Hi,
I've just gotten an i865 system are there any docs out there for
programming the 3d end of this? Intels site for that chipset has no
programmers reference beyond the datasheet which doesn't say muc about 3D
stuff..
Are these docs available non-NDA?
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software E
--- Holger Waechtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmmm, it's not clear to me how this concept would allow real multiple
> user logins at the same time like it is common -- you can rum multiple
> X11 instances on multiple VTs and every new user is able to hit SAK
> without killing other user's ap
Chris Metzler wrote:
Hi. I'm a bit confused about the favored procedure for reporting DRI
bugs. The DRI User Guide, at
Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency of our documentation. As
it turns out, we're in the process of changing the bug repository we use
(again). Adam Jackson is settin
Jon Smirl wrote:
--- Holger Waechtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why does VT switch have to be in the kernel? I can have multiple xterms
logged
in as different users without kernel support. Why can't VT switching be
implemented as if I was switching between multiple fullscreen xterms? I
guess I
don
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 11:25, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
> > --- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>s/OpenGL/Some drawing library/ - providing its using the kernel
> >>interfaces we don't care what. (eg the bogl console driver is very
> >>small, the opengl one would probably be
A rep from the SELinux group was at the Xdev conference. They are starting a
project to verify X server.
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mer, 2004-05-19 at 20:30, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > xserver draws each app into it's own pbuffer. The individual apps don't have
> > access to the main f
On Mer, 2004-05-19 at 20:30, Jon Smirl wrote:
> xserver draws each app into it's own pbuffer. The individual apps don't have
> access to the main framebuffer. A properly designed xserver should be free from
> the screen scraping attack too. The DRM module will have to make sure you can't
> read buf
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mer, 2004-05-19 at 01:35, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > Why does VT switch have to be in the kernel? I can have multiple xterms
> logged
> > in as different users without kernel support. Why can't VT switching be
> > implemented as if I was switching between mult
On Maw, 2004-05-18 at 23:27, Keith Packard wrote:
> No thoughts to supporting multiple sets of VTs, one per physical device
> then?
That would be nice but how much of that needs to be kernel side. Not a
lot I suspect.
---
This SF.Net email is
On Mer, 2004-05-19 at 01:35, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Why does VT switch have to be in the kernel? I can have multiple xterms logged
> in as different users without kernel support. Why can't VT switching be
> implemented as if I was switching between multiple fullscreen xterms? I guess I
> don't see why
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO, this is a long standing problem with the DRM. The main issue is
> that there's only one version number associated with each DRM module.
> What's needed is a device independent version and a device dependent
> version. In a sense, it needs some
Jon Smirl wrote:
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
s/OpenGL/Some drawing library/ - providing its using the kernel
interfaces we don't care what. (eg the bogl console driver is very
small, the opengl one would probably be rather larger and nicer)
I wasn't thinking that the kernel interface wa
--- Holger Waechtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmmm, it's not clear to me how this concept would allow real multiple
> user logins at the same time like it is common -- you can rum multiple
> X11 instances on multiple VTs and every new user is able to hit SAK
> without killing other user's ap
--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From your second post it looks like the same issue as
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 .
> > Run ldd on
> > > glxge
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From your second post it looks like the same issue as
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 .
> Run ldd on
> > glxgears and see where it's getting libGL from.
> >
> > I'm pu
Getting rid of the copy in /usr/X11R6/lib/tls doesn't make a difference.
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From your second post it looks like the same issue as
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 . Run ldd
--- Holger Waechtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why does VT switch have to be in the kernel? I can have multiple xterms
> logged
> > in as different users without kernel support. Why can't VT switching be
> > implemented as if I was switching between multiple fullscreen xterms? I
> guess I
> >
--- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From your second post it looks like the same issue as
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 . Run ldd on
> glxgears and see where it's getting libGL from.
>
> I'm pulling down the SRPM now, I'll take a look in the morning
FYI, relevant patents numbers are:
5,956,431
6,658,146
See more info here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-devel&m=107704096508208&w=2
--- Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Cass wrote:
> >
> > guys,
> >
> > finally have some good news. uploading DXT1, DXT3, and DXT5
> co
Mark Cass wrote:
guys,
finally have some good news. uploading DXT1, DXT3, and DXT5 compressed
textures is working. i still need to implement compressed sub textures
and test very small textures.
the issue was the tile size. i wrote an iterator into the driver to test
all possible tile sizes
Jon Smirl wrote:
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Maw, 2004-05-18 at 21:14, Jon Smirl wrote:
So you don't have any problem with pulling VT support out of the kernel?
You need the code to handle video context switches. You also need vt's
because you have multiple security contexts on the P
26 matches
Mail list logo
