Hi. I'm a bit confused about the favored procedure for reporting DRI bugs. The DRI User Guide, at
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/DRIuserguide.html is recommended by the DRI wiki as important reading before bringing up problems. The DRI User Guide, in turn, suggests the Sourceforge bug database for DRI, at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=387&atid=100387 as the appropriate venue for reporting DRI bugs. Apparently from what I can see, bugs posted there also generate an announcement forwarded to this mailing list. However, elsewhere on the wiki, it seems to be suggested that this procedure is deprecated. Under Development-->BugZilla, it's indicated that DRI bugs be posted through bugs.xfree86.org (to then be manually forwarded on to the dri-devel mailing list if the bug seems relevant to dri), and that the Sourceforge bug tracker is "somewhat out of duty for some time". This last point seems to be borne out by the fact that no bugs posted at Sourceforge have been assigned to someone since almost a year ago. And then, as a third voice, the "Testing/Debugging" page on the Wiki ignores both the Sourceforge bug tracker and the XF86 BugZilla, and suggests just posting the bugs directly to this mailing list. Obviously in all three cases, a bug report ends up in this mailing list. But I can imagine that the favored route is to post a bug through the Sourceforge bug tracker or the XF86 BugZilla, because of additional functionality they provide. Or maybe not. What's the favored path? Thanks, -c -- Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
pgpWTPJHvWtIG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
