Hi,
I'm using X 4.3.0 and Linux 2.4.22. I've got the fb console at
1600x1200x24, X running at 1280x1024x16 and TV out as a second frame
buffer. When running pretty much any opengl stuff, I get a very strange
rainbow lighting/texture effect like in these screenshots:
http://rose.clear.bash.sh/~r
I just wanted to let every body know where this sat. Unfortunately I will not have
time to work
on it much this moth, I have to get my bills straightened ought. I did look into it
and found
that gatos and latest DRI are vary different I would recommend finding an
older(2003/02/25 is the
Xfree8
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
You need this patch
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=2054806&forum_id=7177
for nwn to work (unless you're using the beta 3 client or older, you
definitely need it for 1.29, haven't checked for 1.30 if it's
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > basic 3D engine; it's it similar to the 300 series, it might be
> trivial
> > to add support, but then again, I'm not too familiar with sis
> hardware
> > internals.
>
> I actually took a brief look. The 6326 is a simple PIO engine that
> needs
> triang
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:59, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Factoring it out is not a problem. the question is what to do with it
> when I pull it out. create an external external libray like
> libXMergedFB.so or something like that?
I was thinking of creating a new module like shadowfb.
> what's the p
> basic 3D engine; it's it similar to the 300 series, it might be trivial
> to add support, but then again, I'm not too familiar with sis hardware
> internals.
I actually took a brief look. The 6326 is a simple PIO engine that needs
triangles fed it the right way. I've actually hacked up code borr
Factoring it out is not a problem. the question is what to do with it
when I pull it out. create an external external libray like
libXMergedFB.so or something like that? what's the preferred method?
any existing examples I can look at?
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
> --- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > And the other question is why didn't Kevin want it in the
> > XFree86 tree? Is there going to be a problem merging this
> > code at some point in the future, or did he just think DRI
> > was a natural
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 15:46, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > It seems like a lot of cards have this type of capability and lots of
> > drivers are doing this somewhat independently of one another. Is there
> > some common code that can be abstracted out? (Looking quickly over
> > the code indicate
Alan Hourihane wrote:
Now that Mesa 5.0.2 is out the door, maybe we should tag the trunk and
merge with XFree86 ?
Obviously 5.0.2 is the last version of Mesa based on the old directory
layout and should be fairly easily dropped back into XFree86 too.
Then, we can start working on bringing in Mesa 5
Ian Romanick wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
You need this patch
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=2054806&forum_id=7177
for nwn to work (unless you're using the beta 3 client or older, you
definitely need it for 1.29, haven't checked for 1.30 if it's still
needed). Unfor
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:11:35PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> >--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>In any case, I would really *NOT* like to see another driver end up
> >>like
> >>the r100 / r200 driver. The MGA driver, where multiple chips in the
> >>same
Eric,
Now that you are finishing up the sis 300 series DRI port, how hard
would it be to add support for the 6326? there were databooks for it
flaoting around and there was a utah-glx driver as well. It's a pretty
basic 3D engine; it's it similar to the 300 series, it might be trivial
to add
--- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > looks like the post size limit ate my first attempt to post this.
> >
> > Anyway, I was finally able to access DRI cvs (from
> > dri.freedesktop.org), so I pulled the latest tree and created a
> radeon
> > mergedfb patch agai
I hate to be a pest but can someone let me know where we stand with the
patch that allows Neverwinter Nights to run with current DRI?
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
__
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:39:41PM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Is there a web based CVS viewer on freedesktop.org like there is on
> xfree86 or sourceforge? I personally find it useful when I don't have
> access to my PC. it's also nice for reference.
Good question. Don't know.
On another note
Now that Mesa 5.0.2 is out the door, maybe we should tag the trunk and
merge with XFree86 ?
Obviously 5.0.2 is the last version of Mesa based on the old directory
layout and should be fairly easily dropped back into XFree86 too.
Then, we can start working on bringing in Mesa 5.1 ready for the 6.0
Alex Deucher wrote:
looks like the post size limit ate my first attempt to post this.
Anyway, I was finally able to access DRI cvs (from
dri.freedesktop.org), so I pulled the latest tree and created a radeon
mergedfb patch against it. I've done some testing and it seems to work
fine. The patch o
19 matches
Mail list logo
