Re: [Dri-devel] Re: sched_yield()

2003-07-06 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Ian Romanick wrote: > > The one catch that I see is that I don't see support for the futex ioctl > in any 2.4 kernel. I did a 'grep -ri futex include/' in the source for > 2.4.21-ac2 and for 2.5.69. The 2.4 kernel didn't have any hits, but the > 2.5 kernel did. Of course, t

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: sched_yield()

2003-07-06 Thread Ian Romanick
Ian Romanick wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: You _really_ want to use futex'es for any user-space locking. It's back-ported to 2.4.x, and it gets these cases _right_. There are fair user-space locks based on futexes as part of modern glibc sources, and they are _fast_, since all non-contention (commo

[Dri-devel] [Bug 44] Radeon Driver hard locks during VT switches/resolution changes 8500DV DRI only

2003-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL

[Dri-devel] [Bug 44] Radeon Driver hard locks during VT switches/resolution changes 8500DV DRI only

2003-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL

[Dri-devel] [Bug 44] Radeon Driver hard locks during VT switches/resolution changes 8500DV DRI only

2003-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] letting Tux Racer run on Linux systems?

2003-07-06 Thread Michael
On Monday 07 July 2003 12:54 am, Alexander Stohr wrote: > Hello, > If i did have the tux racer sources then i would not > ask at all and simply try to look into the code There is an open source version. Does that not have the problems? What about running it with indirect rendering forced? I get

[Dri-devel] letting Tux Racer run on Linux systems?

2003-07-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
Hello, dumb question but might help in resolving those well known pending problem with tux racer: Is there any way to run tux racer on the win32 platform? i know you can run nearly any win32 game on linux by using Wine or WineX - but i do want to go the opposite direction. for simple textmode bi

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] ERROR COMPILING - DRI Driver Installation (R E P OS T)

2003-07-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 13:18, Paul Heldens wrote: > > > make -f Makefile.linux radeon.o > > > > > I thought the compilation guide covered this ! > > $ make TREE=/usr/src//include -f Makefile.linux radeon.o Make that make LINUXDIR=/path/to/kernel/source -f Makefile.linux DRM_MODULES=radeon.o f

[Dri-devel] Your buglist for The XFree86 Project's Bugzilla needs attention.

2003-07-06 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at th