Hello Everyone!
Iam trying to install the following VGA driver for
Intel(R) 82845 G/GL Graphics Controler on Rehat 7.1 ,kernel 2.4.x.
i830-20030120-i386-linux.tar.
Iam getting the following output with the error
messages specified in the output.
Please help.
regards
Nitin
XFree86 Version
Title: Untitled Document
DON'T MISS
THE LOWEST MORTGAGE RATES IN HISTORY!
Mortgage
refi rates may be as low as 4.95%!
Poor credit not a problem! Act now before they go up!
For the best
mortgage rates on Planet Earth.
Excellent, Poor, or Fair credit ACCEPTED
CLICK
VP-RX Penis Enlargement Pills
Click Here
Finally!! A medical breakthrough in science has enabled a team of doctors and sex experts to create a pill that is designed to enlarge the male penis by length and width.
Our tests show that out of 1,500 test subjects, the average gain after 4 months on
I've opened a new mach64 branch (mach64-0-0-6-branch), which has now been
updated from the current DRI trunk with X 4.2.99.2 and Mesa 5.x. I've
updated the mach64 driver to Mesa 5 based on the changes to the Rage 128
driver. Testing hasn't shown any problems so far.
I haven't adapted the mach64
Hi all,
I've just recently subscribed and never posted, so I'll give a quick
introduction of myself. I work for Terra Soft Solutions and am the
lead developer of Yellow Dog Linux. This is a rpm-based Linux distro
for PowerPC microprocessors. We tend to track Red Hat fairly closely
and our main h
i dont know much about that designs either.
To my knowledge IGP and IGP 330 trough 350
is most close to the RV200 design.
Therefore the Radeon driver will fit it best.
The FGL codes are tailored to R200 and R300
so the OpenSource drivers are the closer ones.
But i dont have such a device to my
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 11:26, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> 9500 is a r300 based design and is nicely supported.
> 9100 is a r200 based design and is nicely supported.
> (or at least it should be quite nicely supported -
> just assumed because i dont have such a board to my hands.)
Do you know what the
Ge<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ne<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ric Vi<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ag<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ra is now av<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ail<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>able to co<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>nsu<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>me<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>rs
As l<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ow a<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>s $2.<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>25 per do<
(This is keith speaking... Still away from email..)
Ian - go ahead & use either - though my preference is
the first (cleaner) version...
Maybe call them 'Attrib' rather than Generic, to match
the vertex program naming.
Keith
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to commit som
I'm about to commit some minor changes to the X86 code-gen in the Radeon
& R200 drivers. The primary focus is adding SSE assembly stubs.
There is one minor change that I'd like to make to the generic X86
stubs. There are two functions that do exactly the same thing, but with
a different name.
On Die, 2003-02-11 at 14:55, John P. Looney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Michel Dänzer mentioned:
>
> > > wolf.x86: radeon_ioctl.h:165: radeonAllocCmdBuf: Assertion `rmesa->dri.drmMinor
>>= 3' failed.
> > > Received signal 6, exiting...
> > Now you need to make sure the new
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Michel Dänzer mentioned:
> Well, that's the source of my confusion - I don't provide a
> drm-trunk-module-2.4.18 package, and neither does Debian woody. I'll
> just assume you built it yourself from drm-trunk-module-src.
Ah yes, I did build it from your d
On Die, 2003-02-11 at 10:56, John P. Looney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:36:54AM +0100, Michel Dänzer mentioned:
> > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 19:31, John P. Looney wrote:
> > > Hi, I was using the old Radeon drivers that shipped with a dist-upgraded
> > > Woody, though they were mostly fine in
> I really would like to buy an ATI card (9100 or 9500), but
> with no driver
> support I'll have to stay with Nvidia cards.
>
> Hope you have some info for me.
>
> Best regards
> Michael Born
9500 is a r300 based design and is nicely supported.
9100 is a r200 based design and is nicely suppor
Please call 0700 535 5252 to buy email lists, and send your message to thousands of
individuals.
The least expensive way to:
-Promote premium rate telephone lines
-Start a political campaign
-Promote your business
-Sell a product
Your email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is NOT included on the Opt-
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Michael Born wrote:
>Please excuse my not very DRI related question.
>
>Is there an official statement from ATI regarding the product cycle of their
>binary 3D drivers for Linux x86?
>In an interview at www.sharkyextreme.com an ATI person stated that they will
>release 8-10
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:24:58PM +0100, Jacek Pop³awski mentioned:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:31:37PM +, John P. Looney wrote:
> > Hi, I was using the old Radeon drivers that shipped with a dist-upgraded
> > Woody, though they were mostly fine in Quake3, in Wolfenstien, there were
> > seve
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:36:54AM +0100, Michel Dänzer mentioned:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 19:31, John P. Looney wrote:
> > Hi, I was using the old Radeon drivers that shipped with a dist-upgraded
> > Woody, though they were mostly fine in Quake3, in Wolfenstien, there were
> > severe problems wit
18 matches
Mail list logo
