On Die, 2003-02-11 at 14:55, John P. Looney wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Michel D�nzer mentioned: > > > > wolf.x86: radeon_ioctl.h:165: radeonAllocCmdBuf: Assertion `rmesa->dri.drmMinor >>= 3' failed. > > > Received signal 6, exiting... > > Now you need to make sure the new DRM is actually used. The easiest way > > to achieve that is probably to disable the DRM in the kernel. > > I don't understand...I've got these loaded at the moment: > > ratbert:/var/www# lsmod > Module Size Used by Not tainted > i810 64472 0 (unused) > radeon 107896 0 (unused) > radeonfb 17888 0 (unused) > fbcon-cfb24 4320 0 [radeonfb] > fbcon-cfb8 3392 0 [radeonfb] > fbcon-cfb32 3744 0 [radeonfb] > fbcon-cfb16 4032 0 [radeonfb] > > Should the radeon.o not be loaded ? What would then provide the DRM > functionality ?
The point is that this is either the wrong (too old) radeon module, or the radeon DRM is already built into the kernel (in which case you can load another one as a module unfortunately, but clients see the one built into the kernel). -- Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
