Using the texmem-0-0-1 branch from CVS and enabling AGP 4x in
XF86Config-4 causes X to lock upon startup. If I have my xinitrc
setup to run Quake III alone, I first get the bare black and white X
background and cursor for about a second and then some strange lines
move across a black scree
Cool, I'll take a look at the XFree tree when I get back to work,
just to give people a quick idea of what I want initially, I want to use
the hardware flipping as opposed to the blt we do now, and the i815 has
synchronous flipping by default (the async doesn't work properly - errata
to spec) whi
Just a quick follow-up to this. It looks like Arjan's patch comes from
XFree86 CVS, which got a bunch of i830 updates from Keith and David Dawes
a few days ago (which explains the "KW" comments in Arjan's patch). I
assume we'll get these into DRI with the next sync-up. Just another
example of th
Something that's been floating around in my head for a while is that the
mi shadow module isn't particularly well suited for page flipping
because it only updates the second buffer at regular intervals (every
1/50 second AFAIK). I finally got around to trying the XFree86 shadowfb
module instead, a
>So, how do you delay the flip-blit to the vblank but NOT delay other
>rendering?
You would delay rendering from that ring. There are 2 rings on i810
(Only one gets used by XFree/DRM).
Depending on what you are trying to achieve, that may be what you want.
If you used an interrupt to indicate vb
I think Tony is correct. I recalled the description of the CR
Regs which specifically states that you cannot get an interrupt
>From the sync. It does look like you can generate a display event
Interrupt and detect that it was in fact the vsync/vblank.
-Matt
-Original Message-
From: An
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:43:51PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
> > > FYI, I noticed this recent patch from Arjan van de Ven from lkml. It's
> > > got page flipping and user-defined interrupts for i830 (for 2
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:43:51PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
> > FYI, I noticed this recent patch from Arjan van de Ven from lkml. It's
> > got page flipping and user-defined interrupts for i830 (for 2.4):
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-
Human
Growth Hormone Therapy
As seen on NBC, CBS, and CNN,
and even Oprah! The health
discovery that actually reverses aging while burning fat,
without dieting or exercise! This proven discovery has even
been reported on by the New England Journal of Medicine.
Forget
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 03:41, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 01:15:01PM -0800, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
> >
> > The i810's vblank interrupt does not go to the CPU's interrupt
> > controller IIRC. Therefore you have to poll for vblank by reading
> > the current scanline.
>
> I fully
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:43:51PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
> FYI, I noticed this recent patch from Arjan van de Ven from lkml. It's
> got page flipping and user-defined interrupts for i830 (for 2.4):
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103969295019388&w=2
Good catch.
> Out of
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 01:15:01PM -0800, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
>
> The i810's vblank interrupt does not go to the CPU's interrupt
> controller IIRC. Therefore you have to poll for vblank by reading
> the current scanline.
I fully expect that there's something that I'm missing, but shouldn't
s
FYI, I noticed this recent patch from Arjan van de Ven from lkml. It's
got page flipping and user-defined interrupts for i830 (for 2.4):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103969295019388&w=2
Out of curiosity, I just downloaded the i810/i815 specs. At first glance
I don't see why yo
dual Athlon MP 1900+
"cubemap" is solved but "stex3d" and "texdown"+"b" NOT.
MESA_NO_SSE help in both cases.
Mesa/demos> ./cubemap
GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI R200 20021125 AGP 4x x86/MMX/3DNow!/SSE TCL
GL_REFLECTION_MAP_ARB mode
keys:
SPACE - toggle animation
CURSOR KEYS - rotation
m - toggle te
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 01:15:01PM -0800, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
> The i810's vblank interrupt does not go to the CPU's interrupt
> controller IIRC. Therefore you have to poll for vblank by reading
> the current scanline.
That's quite surprising to me.
> Usually apps that are waiting on vblank
Am Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2002 16:20 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2002 15:09 schrieb Alan Hourihane:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 02:50:39PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Latest trunk with 2.4.20 kernel DRM or the DRI DRM module stutters like
> > > hell for some apps on
The i810's vblank interrupt does not go to the CPU's interrupt
controller IIRC. Therefore you have to poll for vblank by reading
the current scanline.
Usually apps that are waiting on vblank can be better served by
solving the actual problem rather than trying to use a generic wait
For vblank sol
[ Short story - I already do exactly this. Long story: some of the
differences between the kernel tree and the DRI CVS tree really need
somebody to get rid of the task-queue usage in DRI CVS, and that I don't
have time for myself at least right now ]
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Alan Hourihane wrot
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 02:50:39PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> > Some apps only run smooth with 2.5.49+ kernels due to Linus latest work.
> > Nothing of it in XFree or DRI, yet.
>
> Linus should submit it here for inclusion - simple. I doubt any
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:16:44PM -, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Well I asked a question on dri-users and Keith said I'd be better asking
> here ..
> I want to get my OpenGL application to stop flickering on my i815 using a
> sync to the vertical refresh, work has apparently started on this for th
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:58:35 +
> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But it's probably a good idea to submit the patch there as well, as it would
> > be good to get it included in 4.3.0.
>
> I thought there would be a merge from DRI-CV
On Don, 2002-12-12 at 23:05, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > > /proc/dri shows 0, 1 and 2.
> > > 0 -> tdfx 0xe200 (The Matrox)
> > > 1 -> radeon 0xe201 PCI:1:0:0 (Radeon 7500 QW AGP)
> > > 2 -> radeon 0xe202 (Radeon, the VGA interface?)
> >
> > No, the radeon DRM actually only registers a single insta
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:18:44AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> ...
> It's clear that both the drm and the 3d clientside drivers have a life outside
> XFree86, but what isn't clear is how to express this in a reasonable
> development environment or set of CVS trees.
Well, lets work on making t
On Fre, 2002-12-13 at 03:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've just reinstalled my system and tried to use dri with my radeon 8500. I've
> my module and drivers (from the debian package, thanks M.Danzer) but i can't
> figure why it's not working. Xfree logs' say that Direct Rendering is enabled,
>
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:58:35 +
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> >
> > One more thing, do you think I should submit my patch to XFree86 as
> > well? Could be a good oportunity to become a member there and get access
> > to NDA docs. Are radeon specs available
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:39:06PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:58:12AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> >>On Don, 2002-12-12 at 21:55, dax wood wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> (WW) R128(0): Can't determine panel dimensions, and none
> >>>specified
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:58:12AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Don, 2002-12-12 at 21:55, dax wood wrote:
(WW) R128(0): Can't determine panel dimensions, and none
specified.
Disabling programming of FP registers.
:::
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:58:12AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Don, 2002-12-12 at 21:55, dax wood wrote:
>
> > (WW) R128(0): Can't determine panel dimensions, and none
> > specified.
> > Disabling programming of FP registers.
> >:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:26:23 +
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi,
while I was messing around with my query programme I found this: if I
specify an invalid screen as argument to XF86DRIGetClientDriverName the
Xserver segfaults. I had a
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:26:23 +
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while I was messing around with my query programme I found this: if I
> > specify an invalid screen as argument to XF86DRIGetClientDriverName the
> > Xserver segfaults. I had a quic
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:14:45PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:02:30PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
...
It takes two to tango so its not just what I need its also what do they
need.
What I would like to see would be:
A single definitive source for the D
Dave Airlie wrote:
Just to give more information..
the first time I run my application it runs fine. I exit it and X reloads
and then I start it again .. the second time the app claims Indirect
rendering, and then X dumps out the below and crashes out..
The app works with the latest i810.o + XF8
32 matches
Mail list logo
