On 23 Jun 2002, Marc Poulhiès wrote:
>Date: 23 Jun 2002 22:28:14 +0200
>From: Marc Poulhiès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>List-Id:
>Subject: Compilation
>
>Hi!
>sorry if this question is very dumb, but i wanted to test the latest dri
>dri
Dear Jose,
> I've disabled the merge with the XFree86 4.2.0 code to see if that
> helps and fired up a new build. Please check if the next binaries
> are ok.
Sorry to report that the latest SF binaries (well, at least
radeon-20020623-linux.i386) are still broken. Same problem, X
David D. Hagood wrote:
> I've come across a weird problem in the Radeon drivers in 4.2 -
> depending upon the horizontal scan rates I specify for my monitor, I can
> cause a divide by zero within the Radeon init code.
>
I see you already have (doh...)
Keith
---
David D. Hagood wrote:
> I've come across a weird problem in the Radeon drivers in 4.2 -
> depending upon the horizontal scan rates I specify for my monitor, I can
> cause a divide by zero within the Radeon init code.
You might be better off posting this problem on the Xpert (XFree86) mailing l
I've come across a weird problem in the Radeon drivers in 4.2 -
depending upon the horizontal scan rates I specify for my monitor, I can
cause a divide by zero within the Radeon init code.
Here's the relevant sections of my XF86Config file:
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "PX-982"
Hori
Smitty wrote:
>>>I want to get started putting up the new site, but no-one has told me
>>>how to access the webspace...
>>>
>>>I've given my sourceforge details and been added to the project...
>>>
>>Ian,
>>
>>I can't help you with access details, but I'd like you to stage this
>>below the current
Oops, sorry for including all of the previous message in my reply. I
probably shouldn't have sent this right after coming home from the pub!
- Frank
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 02:06, Frank Worsley wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> to upload the new site you have to tar it up, then do the following:
>
> scp tar
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 15:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> > On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 12:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anyhow, glxgears really isn't an important benchmark, how do 'real' =
> > > apps
> > > > perform?
> > >
> > >
Hi!
sorry if this question is very dumb, but i wanted to test the latest dri
drivers for my ati radeon 8500 but they wont compile... Here are the
messages i get:
In file included from radeon_drv.c:32:
drmP.h:168: conflicting types for `vmalloc_to_page'
/lib/modules/2.4.18/build/include/linux/mm.
Title: Banner and Text Combined
5340VCHF0-028gzDq8045uMCU3-848KgcV2439fkYT4-049uWhc61l50
Climatique is a specially designed
gel that was created for women who wish to experience,
restore or enhance the pleasure & joy
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:15:35 +0200
Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 January 1970 00:59, Smitty wrote:
> > Hallo Dieter
> >
> > > > > It's just a guess on the agp gart; the IDE and sound both are clones
> > > > > of the AMD chip, so why not the gart?. The big whiz-bang fe
On Thursday 01 January 1970 00:59, Smitty wrote:
> Hallo Dieter
>
> > > > It's just a guess on the agp gart; the IDE and sound both are clones
> > > > of the AMD chip, so why not the gart?. The big whiz-bang feature of
> > > > the nFORCE chipset is the crossbar memory controller that supposedly
>
Hallo Dieter
> > > It's just a guess on the agp gart; the IDE and sound both are clones of
> > > the AMD chip, so why not the gart?. The big whiz-bang feature of the
> > > nFORCE chipset is the crossbar memory controller that supposedly doubles
> > > the bandwidth of DDR (double double data rate
On Sunday 23 June 2002 18:50, Smitty wrote:
> > It's just a guess on the agp gart; the IDE and sound both are clones of
> > the AMD chip, so why not the gart?. The big whiz-bang feature of the
> > nFORCE chipset is the crossbar memory controller that supposedly doubles
> > the bandwidth of DDR (d
Howzit?
Having a bit of an issue with the packages from:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/radeon-20020615-linux.i386.tar.bz2
On a clean install of Linux Mandrake 8.1
XFree 4.1
Kernel 2.4.8 etc
Radeon SDR 32MB / AMD 756/758
Linux Intel x86 Packages:
radeon-20020615-linux.i386.tar.bz2
Using
> Just upgraded to the latest radeon dri-cvs (using the binary packages
> on SF) and now the X server won't start. This used to work fine with
> the 20 May TCL snapshot.
>
> The kernel module seems to load OK:
>
> Jun 19 16:30:36 localhost kernel: [drm] AGP 0.99 on Unknown @ 0xec00 64MB
> J
> It's just a guess on the agp gart; the IDE and sound both are clones of
> the AMD chip, so why not the gart?. The big whiz-bang feature of the
> nFORCE chipset is the crossbar memory controller that supposedly doubles
> the bandwidth of DDR (double double data rate). Why would they bother
> c
> > I want to get started putting up the new site, but no-one has told me
> > how to access the webspace...
> >
> > I've given my sourceforge details and been added to the project...
>
> Ian,
>
> I can't help you with access details, but I'd like you to stage this
> below the current main site
As some other folks have reported, it seems that all the snapshot builds
of the Radeon drivers on dri.sf.net are busted - installing them gives a
Sig-11 on startup.
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
__
Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 12:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Anyhow, glxgears really isn't an important benchmark, how do 'real' =
> > apps
> > > perform?
> >
> > OK, found the 't' key in bzflag - I get around 35 fps on my 7500 DDR,
>
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 12:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> > Anyhow, glxgears really isn't an important benchmark, how do 'real' =
> apps
> > perform?
>
> OK, found the 't' key in bzflag - I get around 35 fps on my 7500 DDR,
> 1800+ Athlon, A7M266-D motherboard. I seem to remember someone sa
> Anyhow, glxgears really isn't an important benchmark, how do 'real' =
apps
> perform?
OK, found the 't' key in bzflag - I get around 35 fps on my 7500 DDR,
1800+ Athlon, A7M266-D motherboard. I seem to remember someone saying
they were getting 150, but I can't remember what card/cpu they ha
On Saturday 22 Jun 2002 1:30 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed
numinously:"
> Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> > On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 18:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> > > ed, 2002-06-19 at 16:59, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > 19 Jun 2002
Hi Ian,
to upload the new site you have to tar it up, then do the following:
scp tarball.tar.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/groups/d/dr/dri/htdocs/
Then login to dri.sf.net with ssh and your SF user id and untar the site
into a temporary directory. Make sure its 'chmod a+r'.
Cheers,
- Frank
On
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:12:08AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
>
>Anyone got any idea what's wrong with the SF binaries? I suspect there
>would be much more useful testing of the CVS drivers if the binaries
>worked!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Andrew
On the 10th of June I updated the system where the
Hello,
I was playing with gears today (again) and this what I've noticed :
$ gears
radeonUpdatePageFlipping allow 1 current 0
(gears runs in the upper left corner ...)
5310 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1062.000 FPS
6488 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1297.600 FPS
6496 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1299.200 FPS
6
Dear Keith -
> This is interesting. The code to cope with multiple contexts there
> hasn't had a huge amount of testing. If I download your code, how
> can I exercise this problem?
Thanks for offering to look at this. Here's how to reproduce the
problem. First download the i386 executable from
27 matches
Mail list logo
