On 31 May 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 02:30, Felix Kühling wrote:
> >
> > I reported lockups shortly after starting the Xserver with a gcc 3.0
> > compiled drm module that triggered the strange permission problem. Now I
> > tested it without loading the dri Xserver module
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
> the ring_wait is really not necessary, since 128 16kB buffers can use a
> max of 512 of the 1024 descriptors. We'd need 4MB of buffers to fill
> the ring.
On second thought, this is only true as long as we're not reusing buffers.
If we reuse buffers f
Well, now I can say that so far all the programs I've tried work (more or less) with
mach64 0-0-4:
-tuxkart doesn't hang anymore with 0.10.0 version (latest): it also worked with 0.9 if
you didn't move your mouse too much (so this could have been some mouse grabbing
problems)
-commercial tuxr
On Fri, 31 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.05.31 02:53 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > I've fixed one bug already that was related to the ring tail being left
> > pre-incremented (the table_end I had before wasn't). Some of my problems
> > were r
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00A1_24D46A2C.C7185E42"
On 31 May 2002 23:20:19 +0200
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 02:30, Felix Kühling wrote:
> >
> > I reported lockups shortly after starting the Xserver with a gcc 3.0
> > compiled drm module that triggered the strange permission problem. Now I
> > tested it with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Friday 31 May 2002 1:09 pm, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> It sounds like the texture cache is getting wiped out, but the DRI drivers
> aren't realizing that it's happened. This shouldn't be too hard to fix if
> someone has time.
Thank you for the
