Jens Owen wrote:
>
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM -0800, Jens Owen wrote:
> > > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> > > Module name: xc
> > > Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/
> > > Changes by: jensowen@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/04/04 10:06:11
> >
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM -0800, Jens Owen wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> > Module name: xc
> > Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/
> > Changes by: jensowen@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/04/04 10:06:11
> >
> > Log message:
> > Converted
> > The P200 pulled off about 75MBytes/sec; the P2-266 pulled off about 55
> > MBytes/sec; the K6-III/550 pulled off about 100MBytes/sec. All of this
was
> > done under Linux; tests were performed with memtest86 (? it's been a
while,
> > basically though they were not performed under any operating
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 2:31 am, David Bronaugh wrote:
> The P200 pulled off about 75MBytes/sec; the P2-266 pulled off about 55
> MBytes/sec; the K6-III/550 pulled off about 100MBytes/sec. All of this was
> done under Linux; tests were performed with memtest86 (? it's been a while,
> basically th
> > Yes, some details were left out of CPU performance increases. The same
was
> > done for memory performance increases though. We have been discussing
> > memory bandwidth as memory performance, completely leaving out memory
> > latency, which has also improved tremendously.
>
> Pardon me, but
Brain wrote:
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 2002-04-03 22:05:47, Brian Paul wrote:
> > > -- Dieter N=FCtzel wrote:
> > > > =20
> > > > One more:
> > > > Brian, is the latest Mesa-4.0.2 stuff already merged?
> > >
> > > The trunk is has the latest 4.0.2 code now.
> >
> > Sorry B
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM -0800, Jens Owen wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> Module name: xc
> Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/
> Changes by: jensowen@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/04/04 10:06:11
>
> Log message:
> Converted MGA driver suite to the new drmCommand
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 17:11:26 -0800
"Raystonn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, some details were left out of CPU performance increases. The same was
> done for memory performance increases though. We have been discussing
> memory bandwidth as memory performance, completely leaving out memory
> l
> > > OK - so a factor 70 in CPU growth and a factor of 16 in RAM speed.
> >
> > No, in this 5 year period, processor clockspeed has moved from
approximately
> > 200MHz to over 2GHz. This is a factor of 10 in CPU growth and 16 in
memory
> > bandwidth. Memory bandwidth is growing more quickly tha
[Note: This e-mail get's into some additional design discussions, so I'm
adding anybody who has responded to the DRM discussion to the CC list,
to circumvent the sourceforge e-mail log jam.]
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:46:59 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> > > (II) I810(0): [d
[Note: This e-mail get's into some additional design discussions, so I'm
adding anybody who has responded to this thread directly to the CC list,
to circumvent the sourceforge e-mail log jam.]
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:01:58 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane w
> I seem to recall there being problems with the AGP driver for this chipset
> in the past, but my brain has trouble remembering things from that long ago.
> :) What kernel version are you using? Perhaps Jeff can comment on this...
I am using kernel 2.4.18 and was using 2.4.17 when I tried the r
Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 2002-04-03 22:05:47, Brian Paul wrote:
> > -- Dieter N=FCtzel wrote:
> > >=20
> > > One more:
> > > Brian, is the latest Mesa-4.0.2 stuff already merged?
> >
> > The trunk is has the latest 4.0.2 code now.
>
> Sorry Brian,
>
> but after your update t
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:02:45PM +0200, Daniel Kulesz wrote:
> So I thought this had to do with the incompatibility between the chipset
> and the radeon. But i would really love to use a radeon in my board, cause
> the only alternative to it would be a voodoo4 which is by far slower and
> doesn
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 09:30:39PM -0800, Raystonn wrote:
> > OK - so a factor 70 in CPU growth and a factor of 16 in RAM speed.
>
> No, in this 5 year period, processor clockspeed has moved from approximately
> 200MHz to over 2GHz. This is a factor of 10 in CPU growth and 16 in memory
> bandwi
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> I've tested the gamma anyway - and we're fine.
Great, thanks for testing.
-- /\
Jens Owen/ \/\ _
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ \ \ Steamboat Springs, Colorado
___
Dri-devel
> > But now think that:
> > you have 8 light sources (specular, highlight, abient
> nicely mixed),
> > some 3 to 8 clipper planes,
> > an exponentional fog function applied,
> > you are using two sided triangles
> > and of course misc material sepcifications.
>
> I suspect that un
Robert,
Great work. You are very thorough in your testing.
Comments inline.
Robert Boucher wrote:
>
> The short answer is everything worked like you expected.
>
> For the details, here are the various configurations I tested (sorry if
> this is mangled):
>
> DRM Lib i810 Kernel Module
Hi
Some time ago I tried installing the Radeon SDR (32mb,agp) on my box with a tyan
trinity 100at board which has a mvp3 chipset. Unfortunately the result was that X hung
up after less than a minute :-( Same of course with any opengl apps etc. Of course i
had loaded the proper drm-module etc.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:01:58 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > Jens,
> >
> > Are we moving the files in
> >
> > xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support
> >
> > into their relevant ddx drivers directory ?
>
> If you are specifically asking about the xf86drm.h files
20 matches
Mail list logo
