Robert,
Great work. You are very thorough in your testing.
Comments inline.
Robert Boucher wrote:
>
> The short answer is everything worked like you expected.
>
> For the details, here are the various configurations I tested (sorry if
> this is mangled):
>
> DRM Lib i810 Kernel Module DDX/DRI Drivers Result
> New New New Pass
> New New Old Pass
> New Old New Pass
> New Old Old Pass
> Old New New Fail
> Old New Old Pass
> Old Old New Fail
> Old Old Old Pass
>
> Where "New" are the objects built from your development branch and "Old"
> are the 4.2 versions.
>
> Each successful configuration was tested with glxinfo, glxgears, and a
> Tux Racer race.
>
> In the case of the two failures, the server didn't start and the last
> lines of the XFree86 log file was:
>
> (II) I810(0): [dri] Buffer map : ca3000
> (II) I810(0): [drm] added 256 4096 byte DMS buffers
>
> Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 4. Server aborting
I'm working on a better means of reporting this error.
> Each test uses the X server I built from drmcommand branch of the DRI
> source tree.
>
> Are there any other tests you think would be useful?
You've covered the basics. If we change the error message reporting or
header file layout, then a quick regression test would be great. We'll
get broader coverage of the DDX/DRI drivers when we merge to the trunk.
Thanks, again, for your help.
-- /\
Jens Owen / \/\ _
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ \ \ Steamboat Springs, Colorado
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel