On 2002.02.27 01:23 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > It's done. At least, the trivial changes are made. There is still
> problems
> > in the DDX due to changes in the XFree 4.2.0 tree, and in the Mesa 3D
> > driver.
>
> I thought there were only mininal change
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> It's done. At least, the trivial changes are made. There is still problems
> in the DDX due to changes in the XFree 4.2.0 tree, and in the Mesa 3D
> driver.
I thought there were only mininal changes to the mach64 (ati) DDX driver
4.2.0. I didn't run
It's done. At least, the trivial changes are made. There is still problems
in the DDX due to changes in the XFree 4.2.0 tree, and in the Mesa 3D
driver.
On 2002.02.26 21:01 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Leif,
> >
> > On 2002.02.26 19:35 Leif Delgass wrote
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> >> what I understood, 3.3.6 doesn't use GLX, which is why it didn't
> >> work. I'm not quite clear on all of this however, so please
> >> correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> >Hi Mike,
> >
> >Sorry for not replying sooner. XFree8
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> Leif,
>
> On 2002.02.26 19:35 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > So the mach64-0-0-3-branch is the DRI trunk with the new mahc64 dirs and
> > files added and changes from mach64-0-0-2-branch manually merged, right?
> >
>
> For now it's just equal to the trunk. B
Leif,
On 2002.02.26 19:35 Leif Delgass wrote:
> So the mach64-0-0-3-branch is the DRI trunk with the new mahc64 dirs and
> files added and changes from mach64-0-0-2-branch manually merged, right?
>
For now it's just equal to the trunk. But my local copy is as you
described.
> Is the branch up
So the mach64-0-0-3-branch is the DRI trunk with the new mahc64 dirs and
files added and changes from mach64-0-0-2-branch manually merged, right?
Is the branch up to date with your working tree or do you still have local
changes? I'd like to hack on this too, but I don't want to get in your
way
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Brian Paul wrote:
>> what I understood, 3.3.6 doesn't use GLX, which is why it didn't
>> work. I'm not quite clear on all of this however, so please
>> correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>Hi Mike,
>
>Sorry for not replying sooner. XFree86 4.2 does not support libGL
>rendering to 3.
On Die, 2002-02-26 at 18:07, Peter Surda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:32:25PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > Hmm.. Michel, Peter, is it possible that "poll" function in DRM driver is
> > > > > screwed up ? Though I thought that texture transfer goes through an ioctl..
> > > > It does
Well, I'm answering to my own question, just in case someone is also
interested!
I've finished merging and I'm now compiling. It's clear now that
although making a 'cvs update' for everything would be quicker to get a
merge, there would be several cases where the code wouldn't be properly
merged
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:32:25PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > Hmm.. Michel, Peter, is it possible that "poll" function in DRM driver is
> > > > screwed up ? Though I thought that texture transfer goes through an ioctl..
> > > It does, and Peter says the cycles are wasted in user space, or
I'm in the process of merging the files from mach64-0-0-2-branch into
the recently created mach64-0-0-3-branch from the trunk.
The way I'm doing is (on a directory basis):
- make a diff of the entire directory to get the global picture of the
differences
- update the files that are only in the
On Die, 2002-02-26 at 15:34, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>
> On 26 Feb 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Son, 2002-02-24 at 16:26, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Peter Surda wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:38:36AM +0100, Michel Dä
I am using the latest CVS from Xfree and the introduction of Quake III is
not working.I have changed xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/mga/mga_xmesa.c line
220 from __driMesaMessage(...) to __driUtilMessage(...) as Klaus Rose
suggested and although I can play the game, the introduction renders the
first f
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Andree Borrmann wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:21:01AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >> Does the Mesa 3.4.2 that is part of XFree86 4.2.0 support OpenGL
> >> with XFree86 3.3.6 servers?
> >
> >GLX indirect mode should work. I recently (ac
On 26 Feb 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Son, 2002-02-24 at 16:26, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Peter Surda wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:38:36AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > BEFORE the "if", X load sinks by about 20% during vid
On 2002.02.26 13:41 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:32:39PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.02.26 13:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >Your better off creating a branch from the trunk and merging your work
> > >over that way. Seeing as the mach64-0-0-1 branch is stil
On 2002.02.26 13:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:06:17PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I have just merged the trunk into my mach64-0-0-2-branch making
> >
> > cvs update -kk -d -P -j HEAD
> >
> > and I solved most of the conflicts, but I noticed that this is still
> not
I have just merged the trunk into my mach64-0-0-2-branch making
cvs update -kk -d -P -j HEAD
and I solved most of the conflicts, but I noticed that this is still not
enough for a proper merge. There are several directories unrelated to
mach64 that aren't in synch with the trunk because
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 19:50, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 07:58:14PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
>
> > Given this hardware limitation, most GL_MODULATE cases can produce
> > incorrect results with alpha blending enabled. Using software fallbacks
> > for these cases could serious
On Son, 2002-02-24 at 16:26, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Peter Surda wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:38:36AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > BEFORE the "if", X load sinks by about 20% during video playing, BOTH when
> > > > using dri (25->5) or not using DR
21 matches
Mail list logo
