Hi all,
I just recently subscribed to this listserv (about 24 hours ago!), and I
think that I have just found a bug - I hope that this is the correct
forum for this! If not, please direct me to where I can post this.
I ran the isosurf program that someone else mentioned earlier today and
it r
Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
>
> swoop@tweakster:~$ ./isosurf
> 7179 vertices, 7177 triangles
>
> :\ that's all I get :) Looks neat ...
Hit 'b' to run the benchmark. "Use the source, Luke..."
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:44:27PM -0400, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:30:40PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> > Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> > >
> > > just compiled installed XFree 4.1 + mesa 3.5 (mesa-3-5 trunk from CVS).
> > >
> > > swoop@tweakster:~$ ./gears
> > > 5544
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:30:40PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> >
> > just compiled installed XFree 4.1 + mesa 3.5 (mesa-3-5 trunk from CVS).
> >
> > swoop@tweakster:~$ ./gears
> > 5544 frames in 5 seconds = 1108.8 FPS
> > 5600 frames in 5 seconds = 1120 FPS
> > 5602
Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
>
> just compiled installed XFree 4.1 + mesa 3.5 (mesa-3-5 trunk from CVS).
>
> swoop@tweakster:~$ ./gears
> 5544 frames in 5 seconds = 1108.8 FPS
> 5600 frames in 5 seconds = 1120 FPS
> 5602 frames in 5 seconds = 1120.4 FPS
> 5606 frames in 5 seconds = 1121.2 FPS
> 559
just compiled installed XFree 4.1 + mesa 3.5 (mesa-3-5 trunk from CVS).
swoop@tweakster:~$ ./gears
5544 frames in 5 seconds = 1108.8 FPS
5600 frames in 5 seconds = 1120 FPS
5602 frames in 5 seconds = 1120.4 FPS
5606 frames in 5 seconds = 1121.2 FPS
5599 frames in 5 seconds = 1119.8 FPS
thats +60
Imakefile.inc fixes ...
--
Zilvinas Valinskas
Index: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/ffb/Imakefile.inc
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/ffb/Imakefile.inc,v
retrieving revision 1.2.6.2
diff -u -r1.2.6.2 Imakefile.inc
-
Well that's for mesa-3.5 branch in CVS.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 06:34:07PM -0400, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> In /opt/dri/build/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/Imakefile.inc
>
> #if BuildXF86DRI
> DRI_DEFINES = GlxDefines -DX_BYTE_ORDER=ByteOrder
>DRI_INCLUDES = -I$(GLXLIBSRC)/dri \
>
In /opt/dri/build/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/Imakefile.inc
#if BuildXF86DRI
DRI_DEFINES = GlxDefines -DX_BYTE_ORDER=ByteOrder
DRI_INCLUDES = -I$(GLXLIBSRC)/dri \
-I$(GLXLIBSRC)/glx \
-I$(INCLUDESRC) \
-I$(INCLUDESRC)/GL \
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Mike Westall wrote:
> Thilo,
>
> You make it sound as though you propose an easy and obvious
> solution with no adverse side-effects.
>
> Such is not the case.
>
> You are implicitly assuming a compatibility model in which
> any newer version of r128.o is GUARANTEED to w
Thilo,
You make it sound as though you propose an easy and obvious
solution with no adverse side-effects.
Such is not the case.
You are implicitly assuming a compatibility model in which
any newer version of r128.o is GUARANTEED to work with any
older version of the DRI. In ideal world that w
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sirs:
My notebook (Dell C800 Latitude) has a built-in RAGE MOBILITY 128 AGP 4X
graphics card.
The chiptype is M4 AGP4X. The corresponding kernel module is the
r128.o which also enables DRI. The following setup works
perfectly fine --- including DRI:
kernel 2.4.3
XFree
12 matches
Mail list logo
