On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 4:49 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> I could live with either approach existing in the codebase. I won't
>> express a preference, though - I'll leave the decision of which
>> ap
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM, James Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> My concern with having two fields is that it introduces a false
>> dichotomy. There aren't just 2 options here - potentially any
>> permuta
Hi all,
I've just committed [12003], which reverted commit [12000]. This
mirrors commit [11941], which reverted [11881]. These commits all
relate to translation updates for the 1.0.X branch.
Translations should *not* be backported to the 1.0.X branch. The 1.0.X
branch is in security fix only mode
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Sean Brant wrote:
> I just upgraded to the latest trunk today and the admin now throws an
> exception http://dpaste.com/138130/ when I try and save to a
> ImageField. I messed with it a bit to make sure that it was not
> something else in my code that could be cau
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Nic Pottier wrote:
>
> New to Django, but certainly not web development. After being
> pleasantly surprised with a lot of the available Django filters I was
> rather surprised not to see a string truncation filter included.
>
> A little googling shows I'm not the
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> Secondly, IMHO raw truncation based on characters is bad practice for
>> human readable text. A sentence is composed of words, not characters.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Natim wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are working on a project where some people (which are member of the
> staff) need to see one of the administration page (And be able to use
> the search, sort, .. process) without having any right to the data but
> be able to r
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Natim wrote:
>
> The real question is: Is it possible to implements the view
> permission in Django admin?
> Why isn't it implemented yet since it seems to be useful for numbers
> of users and that there is no direct security issues with that?
I don't want to see
Hi all,
If you have been using the new email backend feature in trunk, you
should be aware that SVN revision 12084 introduces a small, but
backwards-incompatible change.
If you are using Django 1.1 (i.e., Django stable), or you haven't
manually specified EMAIL_BACKEND in your settings file, you w
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Gustavo Narea
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One more update about the WSGI related improvements for Django:
>
> I have created a Mercurial branch to keep track of these changes and
> keep them synchronized with trunk:
> http://bitbucket.org/Gustavo/django-wsgi/
>
> Even though
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:57 AM, buttman wrote:
> On Jan 2, 5:52 pm, Simon Willison wrote:
>> On Dec 30 2009, 10:28 pm, Wim Feijen wrote:
>>
>> > In the discussions on CSRF there have been several proposals to
>> > include RequestContext by default in render_to_response or in a
>> > similar funct
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
> I'm pursing expert feedback on the crypto used in Django signing /
> signed cookies. Here's the e-mail I'm sending out to various mailing
> lists. I'll also link to this post from a number of places and see if
> I can get some smart eyes on i
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> I'm in complete agreement with Simon on this point. I fail to see the
>> benefit of decorators in this context.
>
> I can see one valid point that "render_to" guys have. Whic
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> I haven't taken the temperature of anyone else in the core, but you
>> can take it as read that Simon and myself are both +1. The sprint this
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, harrym wrote:
> I'm working a templatetag that determines whether to use 'a' or 'an'
> in front of English words. My particular use case for this is in a
> tumblelog app I'm developing - many different types of entry may be
> added (link, html, quote, etc), and I'm
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Brett Hoerner wrote:
> On Dec 22 2009, 4:27 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> I'll need to cogitate on this over my Christmas pudding :-)
>
> Did you come to any conclusions, or need any more feedback on the read-
> slave testing iss
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Rick van Hattem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe this question has already been asked, but I am wondering why Jinja2
> compatibility can't be fixed in a clean way. Currently the code assumes that
> if an exception has a "source" attribute that it's a Django exception and can
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mario Briggs wrote:
> Russ,
>
> The indexing that Oracle is supporting is 'index-on-expression'. DB2
> also supports that, but it isnt enabled for character long columns,
> since they hadnt had a request for that. I talked to the DB2 server
> folks about these use-c
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:17 AM, j...@jeffcroft.com wrote:
> With MultiDB, it's now essential that custom model save methods accept
> the "using" keyword argument. However, the docs explicitly suggest a
> signature like:
>
> def save(self, force_insert=False, force_update=False):
>
> (You can see t
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Brett Hoerner wrote:
> On Jan 5, 8:09 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> If you're actually doing master/slave in the wild, your guidance may
>> actually be more enlightening than my theoretical navel gazing. In
>> particular - how
Hi all,
I've just uploaded a patch for #5390, which adds signals to
many-to-many modifying operations.
This is a ticket that was a low-priority accepted item for 1.1
(ORM-18), but got bumped due to time [1]. For some reason, it wasn't
resubmitted for 1.2.
The purpose of this post is twofold:
1)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2010 12:04:27 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>> Any feedback on this design?
>
> Just a few things:
>
> 1) In assessing performance impact, people need to be clear that there
> is just one signal ha
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was prompted by this post:
>
> http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/database-soup/stuff-id-love-to-see-from-
> django-36278
>
> to add some notes about some DB access optimizations (essentially the
> things I mentioned in my comment on that
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Dave wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name is Dave Weber, and I'm a student at the University of Toronto,
> studying Computer Science. For one of our undergraduate courses led by
> Greg Wilson (http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~gvwilson/), myself and a group
> of 10 other c
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Xia Kai(夏恺) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> IMHO this patch would still make django issue illogical signals in admin.
> frans and I have pointed out that the __set__ method in the
> ManyRelatedObjectsDescriptor is flawed[1-2], which is used by admin.
It isn't as simple as say
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Jeff Balogh wrote:
> How do you guys feel about getting an incomplete translation for some
> locales? We might want to support some locales that Django doesn't
> have yet, but I'm trying not to overload our localizers with all the
> strings in Django (they're alrea
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Xia Kai(夏恺) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First thing first, I shall explain why this have something to do with admin.
>
> Django's admin save m2m relationship in ModelAdmin's change_view method.
> After some tracing, you would find that the m2m relationship is saved using
> Mod
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:10 AM, SmileyChris wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 6, 11:09 pm, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>> I realize I'm very late giving feedback on the API, sorry and feel
>> free to ignore if I'm too late.
>>
>> That said, from the docs, the API to set the effective messaging level
>> is awkward:
>>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM, thebitguru wrote:
> Can we please get a final decision on this please?
I was under the impression I *had* given a final decision - we should
reject Inf and NaN as invalid values.
The ticket hasn't been closed because we're not focussing on bug fixes
at the momen
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:17 PM, thebitguru wrote:
> Oh, I thought someone else might also have to agree, but anyways, I
> see (http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.2Roadmap) that the
> complete feature freeze is January 26 so I will check again on
> February 11 :)
>
> I changed the versio
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
> 2010/1/13 Tobias McNulty :
>> I am by no means an expert on the matter, but I remember seeing a comment
>> awhile back suggesting that it generally makes more sense to fix the 2to3
>> script than to maintain two branches of the same library. Migh
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> There was a discussion here some time ago about logging in Django that led
> to the ticket 12012 [1] where Simon has done most (all?) of the
> implementation.
>
> There is still a disagreement on the format of the configur
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Thomas Wanschik
wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 1:10 pm, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>> Hi,
>> our non-relational port has come to the point where we need to
>> back-port the SQL layer to the query backend API (i.e., the new
>> query_class()). We could need some help from Djan
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, simonb wrote:
> I think this ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12386
> identifies a change in the m2m code which breaks backwards
> compatibility.
Hi Simon,
I'm aware of the ticket - there are a couple of tickets that I need to
take a look at regarding
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Speaking for myself, I'm pretty busy trying to get features completed
>> before the 1.2 feature deadline. At the moment, anything that isn't o
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Vitaly Babiy wrote:
> I have also been thinking about this, I think there is one problem but I am
> not sure. This is when you have functional test and they need talk to a
> database. In most cases you will be using transactions which should be fine,
> but if for s
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Mat Clayton wrote:
> I know this isn't really related, but figure I would bring it up here. When
> working on optimizing our django app, it became very clear that one of the
> biggest issues as usual is Indexes, particularly multi column indexes, which
> at present
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Mat Clayton wrote:
> Great, have to confess I don't know the ORM internals at all, so not sure
> how long this could take me, shall see what I can do. Also any indications
> of where/what to start looking for would be appreciated.
In the end, db_index_together wil
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Mat Clayton wrote:
> Thanks, I've looked over both sets of code, seem's fine to me. The only
> complex stuff is that Indexes can only be created on certain field types, so
> additional checks may need doing. Also different index types are available
> on different s
Hi all,
This is a quick call for comment on ticket #12624.
This ticket proposes to make Django's test runner a class-based,
rather than function based operation.
This makes it much easier to modify the individual parts of the
behavior of the Django test runner. For example if you want to:
- no
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM, flo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm not really a developer on Django itself, but I am fairly
>> interested in non-relational databases, and some of the things being
>> said in this thread worry me a bit.
>
>
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> That said - I really do want to see logging in Django's trunk. If we
>> can sort out the details in the background and get a good
>> implementation ready, it could easily be th
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Waldemar Kornewald
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM, flo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>&g
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Bill Hubauer wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to the group, so my apologies if this has been discussed
> already. I have some serious reservations about the implementation
> of the "default" database in the new multi-db support feature.
>
> Anytime you obtain a mo
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Mat Clayton wrote:
> Thrown together a first attempt at adding multi column indexes and just want
> some comments on the syntax used, for example.
> from django.db import models
> class Poll(models.Model):
> question = models.CharField(max_length=200, db_index=
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Jeff Balogh wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a quick call for comment on ticket #12624.
>>
>> This ticket proposes to make Django's test runner a class-based
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Eric Holscher wrote:
> Saw this go in, and it gets a huge +1 from me as well. However, I know that
> in the past we have talked about adding other things to the test runner
> (like coverage, etc), so it would seem like now would be a good time to
> recommend accep
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> There are some cases where this shouldn't happen - for example, in a
>> master/slave setup. I'm tinkering with some code at the moment to
>> control this sort of database
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Brett Hoerner wrote:
>>
>> I would think read-slaves would be a pretty common application of
>> multidb, but I can only speak to our use case. I know it's a bit late
>>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Brett Hoerner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would think read-slaves would be a pretty common application
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Bill Hubauer wrote:
>>
>> One of the use cases that may be common for multiple database support is
>> being able to combine multiple Django applications that require different
>> databases into a singl
Hi all,
I've just uploaded a new patch improving the multi-db interface. This
patch introduces a way to easily configure the database selection
process, and enables you to assign a database selection mechanism to
models not under your control (e.g., changing database usage for the
contrib.auth app
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Ok - so that's the patch. Any comments, queries, or criticisms are welcome.
>
> I'm happy -- +1.
>
> One thing, to point out, thoug
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>> I don't understand how avoiding the settings.py mechanism will produce
>> *more* flexibility.
>
> The problem -- at least as I see it -- is that of a intertwingulment
> of "applicati
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Yuri Baburov wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Thanks, I'm rather happy too.
> It's exactly what we wanted!
>
> DB Routing API is even better than some fixed db routing format.
> I just thought about any model with GFK, like TagField from django-tagging --
> with multidb, t
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Andy McKay wrote:
> One of my favourite errors in Python is this one:
>
> File "settings.py", line 2
> SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xce' in file settings.py on line 2,
> but no encoding declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.ht
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Yuri Baburov wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Secondly, while I can see how this information could be useful, it
>> doesn't change the fact that the information is just as easy
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> class MasterSlaveRouter(object):
>> def db_for_read(self, model, db=None):
>> # Point all read operations to a random slave
>> return random.choice(
Hi all,
This is a call for comments on what I hope will be the last two
modifications to multi-db support for 1.2.
Barring negative feedback, I aim to commit this at the start of next
week, just in time for the beta-1 feature freeze.
Change 1: Identifying which models are on which database
-
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:14 AM, x13 wrote:
> (sorry for my English mistakes)
> Hello all, I have a problem with the count() function when I try to
> use it in an empty many_to_many relationship. I have these models:
>
>
> class Photo(models.Model):
> ...
>
> class Gallery(models.Model):
> ...
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Bill Hubauer wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given the new multi-db implementation, I put together a couple of little
> "helper" classes to make app specific, or model specific databases really
> easy.
>
> Please consider the following and let me know if you think this
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Yuri Baburov wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> regarding that doc page,
>
> there's a typo, please remove that hanging "admin.site.register":
> class PublisherAdmin(MultiDBModelAdmin):
> inlines = [BookInline]
>
> admin.site.register
Done - thanks for the report, Yur
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:06 AM, TiNo wrote:
> Hi,
> The reason I posted there was to see if anybody had any objections to the
> one-liner patch [2] I suggested for a dutch translation that is wrong at the
> moment. It would be really nice to see this checked in for 1.2, as it has
> been looking q
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hey folks --
>
> Are we on track for releasing a 1.2 beta this week?
>
> That'd match our original schedule, but we did miss 1.2 alpha by a
> week or so, so perhaps we should push back the beta to match? Or is
> everyone happy with progre
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2010 18:55:34 Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> Hey folks --
>>
>> Are we on track for releasing a 1.2 beta this week?
>>
>> That'd match our original schedule, but we did miss 1.2 alpha by a
>> week or so, so perhaps we should pu
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> Hey folks --
>>
>> Are we on track for releasing a 1.2 beta this week?
>>
>> That'd match our original schedule, but we did miss 1.2 a
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12399
>
> It's a nasty bug which leads to a 100% cache misses situation on
> memcached when using long keys timeouts.
>
> Do you think we can have this included in 1.2? Should i mark it with
> Version:1
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> During the Chicago sprint a few weeks ago I put together a patch for
> #6191: the admin's "the following related objects will be deleted"
> list in some cases omits items that actually are deleted (oops!). The
> admin has its own ro
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Jukka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose adding a method to Model that can be used to fetch
> a "fresh" version of a model object from the database.
This isn't a completely unreasonble idea, but it is an unreasonable
time to suggest it :-)
We are days away
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Alex Robbins
wrote:
> This ticket adds label and verbose_name to apps. I know this would be
> very useful for lots of people.
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3591
>
> Is it too late for it to make it into 1.2? What can we do to make sure
> it makes it in fo
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Harro wrote:
> +1
>
> Sick of explaining to dutch customers that I can't translate those
> texts in the admin.
This may be the case, but...
> It's a simple patch which doesn't break backwards compatibility at
> all.
...neither of these statements is correct.
I
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Ben Firshman wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2010, at 18:55, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> Are we on track for releasing a 1.2 beta this week?
>
> That'd match our original schedule, but we did miss 1.2 alpha by a
> week or so, so perhaps we should push back the beta to match? O
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:47 PM, patrickk wrote:
> @jannis: no, it isn´t. I thinkg you are able to _add_ js to your admin
> views, but you´re not able to _remove_ javascripts. there´s still way
> too much hardcoded stuff with the admin-interface (IMO).
>
> I hope that including jquery with the ad
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Suno Ano wrote:
> I've looked at the users and devel mailing list but didn't find
> any information on HTML 5. I found
> http://github.com/rhec/django-html5 though. Can anybody tell me
> if there are any plans with regards to HTML 5 in Django and if
> so, what are
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Richard Laager wrote:
> There's a small bug in RawQuerySet. It breaks (returns a deferred model
> instance instead of a regular model instance even when the appropriate
> column is SELECTed) with models that have a ForeignKey with a db_column
> specified. For examp
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> I've uploaded a patch for this ticket, which fixes a somewhat obscure
> problem:
Thanks for the patch.
However, as noted in [1], you don't need to post to django-dev just to
tell us you uploaded a patch. The core developers all track
dj
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> However, as noted in [1], you don't need to post to django-dev just to
>> tell us you uploaded a patch.
>
> OK, sorry for the noise. Sin
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Dave Jeffery wrote:
> I know this is a bad time to bring up feature requests but I would most
> likely have forgotten to bring it up at a later date.
> Would a hide_email template tag be a good addition to the standard set of
> template tags in django? There's a sni
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:19 AM, James Bennett wrote:
> I'm kind of choosing this arbitrarily, but as far as I can tell we
> should be good to go for rolling a beta any time. So I'm picking
> Thursday.
>
> If there are any blockers I'm not aware of, let me know. Also, note
> that this will be the f
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:53 AM, kmpm wrote:
> Wouldn't a database router like this sort of do the thing for now...
Yes - this is exactly what a router is designed for.
At the time I posted my last reply, routers didn't exist yet. I had to
implement routers in order to solve some other problems,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Richard Davies
wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:19 pm, James Bennett wrote:
>> Also, note that this will be the final feature freeze for 1.2;
>> if it ain't in trunk when I roll the tarball, it'll have to wait until 1.3.
>
> Any chance of getting #10476 and #11156 in?
>
> Both
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:00 AM, scastillo wrote:
> And what if i just want to have the same database but with different
> users for each app on project?
If, by "users" are you referring to the database login credentials,
you could set up a multiple connections to the same database, each
with a di
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:11 AM, kmpm wrote:
> Hmm... strange.
> I get a strange error when I tried to do this
> Something about a django_content_type relation which I don't have.
> This probably happens when the "app" gets registerd in the auth
> system.
> Same error with both postgresql and
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, tezro wrote:
> Hi everybody.
>
> I use Django for about a year, do websites for about 5 years, am kind
> of experienced in web, interface and techdesign, used lots of CMS or
> other site management tools (99% is a piece of crab). And I'm writing
> here because altho
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:37 PM, j...@jeffcroft.com wrote:
> All due respect to Wilson (he's a great designer, a good friend, and
> he and I have talked on several occasions about the Django admin
> interface), I have to agree that the Django admin interface is dated
> and has some UI issues that c
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Dave Jeffery wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, tezro wrote:
>> >
>> > As the most obvious thing - here's the margin/padding problem on
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Yannick Gingras wrote:
>
> Greetings Django-devs,
> as stated previously, we organize a translation sprint in Montréal on
> 2010-02-15. What we have not decided yet is what version of the
> documentation we are going to translate. We want our effort to be
> inclu
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 7:55 AM, j...@jeffcroft.com wrote:
>
>> 1. I'm not in favor of redesigns for redesigns' sake; yes, the current
>> admin UI has been around for a while, but if we rework it, we
>> should rework it because there are actual issues with it which need
>> to be resolved.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:11 AM, j...@jeffcroft.com wrote:
>> I'm opposed to this. Firstly, unless I've missed something whoever
> gets the position, would definitionally get it before they've done
> anything!
>
> To respond to just this bit: you're right, but the reason whoever gets
> this positi
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Idan Gazit wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 11:58 pm, "j...@jeffcroft.com" wrote:
>> You're right, Idan. Sorry if I steered it off-track! I sent Wilson a
>> message asking him to check out this thread.
>
> Awesome, thanks!
>
>> I think we first need to make sure we ARE going f
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:34 PM, j...@jeffcroft.com wrote:
> So, unless anyone disagrees with the idea that Wilson should have
> first dibs on this position, it sounds like we have ourselves a Design
> Czar. Or whatever you want to call it. Woot!
I, for one, welcome our new (erm... old) Design Ove
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Justin Lilly wrote:
> To add another point, this doesn't mean that the day 1.2 hits release that
> everyone is gung-ho on 1.3. If past releases are any indication, there is
> usually a refactory period of a few weeks when everyone is basking in
> post-release bliss.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>>
>> What do people think?
>
> Ugh. Assuming no one can come up with a brilliant fix so that the auto_adapt
> stuff can work when combined with arbitrary other decorators (I can't), I
> favor
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2010 02:40:03 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>> >> What do people think?
>> >
>> > Ugh. Assuming no one can come up with a brilliant fix so that the
>> > auto_adapt stuf
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Hi list
>
> Using David Cramer's really nice replacement devserver
> (http://github.com/dcramer/django-devserver), I noticed a bunch of
> huge queries in some table generation code. Example:
> http://dpaste.com/156907/
> This is from one o
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:41 PM, PauloS wrote:
> Currently it is easy to change the template engine in a Django
> project, but if you change the ORM layer you lost the whole Admin
> thing, the very app that made Django so special.
>
> If we are talking about refactoring Admin code (not only html/c
Hi all,
I need some feedback/assistance from those with experience with the
translation tool set.
Karen Tracey just pointed out that I may have made a booboo with the
handling of translations in the 1.1.X branch.
I committed updates to trunk for the no, fr, nl, sk, cz and ro
translations. I also
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Jari Pennanen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering what is the status of branch branches/soc2009/http-
> wsgi-improvements (
> http://github.com/django/django/tree/soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements
> )? I'm personally interested one bug it fixes, mainly ticket #2131
> (
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Simon Meers wrote:
> Disclaimer: Just in case this was a naive mistake on my part, I posted
> this on django-users first [1] and posed the question several times on
> #django, but have received no answers.
Firstly, django-dev isn't "second tier tech support" - if
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need some feedback/assistance from those with experience with the
>> translation tool set.
>>
>> Karen Tracey just poin
301 - 400 of 2850 matches
Mail list logo
