On 9/18/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> greater-than sign (SHORTTAG NET, the particular flavor of SHORTTAG in
> this example, dictates that a single forward slash constitutes the
> closing of the element
I mistyped that and sent too soon; the slash actually closes the tag,
not th
On 9/18/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, all this is based on my assumption that something like this:
>
>
>
> is invalid as HTML4, but I haven't verified that HTML4 can't have self
> closing tags.
It's valid, but it doesn't mean the same thing it does in XHTML; in
HTM
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:25:37PM -0500, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On 9/15/06, Scott Paul Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Inter-field dependency. For example:
>
> Most of this looks like it can be much more flexibly handled by the
> already-available validator syntax (which, I assume, wi
On 9/15/06, Scott Paul Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Inter-field dependency. For example:
Most of this looks like it can be much more flexibly handled by the
already-available validator syntax (which, I assume, will be finishing
its migration into the model system).
--
"May the forces
On 9/13/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (I'm not an official "dev" so I hope it's not considered inappropriate
> of me to provide my feedback.)
It's not inappropriate at all. :)
> Instead of the assumption that bind() validates, why not have an
> is_valid() method that assumes bind
On 9/13/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> > Assumptions: form.bind(data) does *not* return a BoundForm. bind does
> > the validation and probably populates form.errors or .errors() or
> > whatever. bind returns True or False depending on whether validation
