On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:25:37PM -0500, James Bennett wrote:
> 
> On 9/15/06, Scott Paul Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Inter-field dependency. For example:
> 
> Most of this looks like it can be much more flexibly handled by the
> already-available validator syntax (which, I assume, will be finishing
> its migration into the model system).
> 

Ah, I wasn't aware that the validator system would be moving into
models. Must have missed that. That's even better :)

-- 
Scott Paul Robertson
http://spr.mahonri5.net
GnuPG FingerPrint: 09ab 64b5 edc0 903e 93ce edb9 3bcc f8fb dc5d 7601

Attachment: pgpgZe9XDajY6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to