On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:50 PM, alex.gay...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> I think Eric's proposal is dead on, it accomplishes the same task, but
> does it without inducing any overhead, since once we assume 2.6 we
> inherently assume json is included. So +1 on it as Eric has
> suggested, -0 as it was o
I think a better approach would be to have django.utils.simplejson as
a sort of alias package (which is easy using Python's introspection).
What would happen is this:
A user imports either django.utils.simplejson, or something from
inside it.
We look for the 'json' package on the path (Python 2.6
I have nothing against removing it from the built-in libs, but as long
as we look for the system's libraries first what's the big downside to
keeping it?
On Dec 1, 5:02 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the thing that's bugging me is that this mostly seems to come
> down to historical inertia; we already have simplejson in Django,
I think Eric's proposal is dead on, it accomplishes the same task, but
does it without inducing any overhead, since once we assume 2.6 we
inherently assume json is included. So +1 on it as Eric has
suggested, -0 as it was originally proposed.
Alex
On Dec 1, 1:25 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL
On Nov 30, 9:51 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Django 1.1: JSON serialization looks for system json/simplejson
> first, fall back to django.utils.simplejson if not found and warn
> with PendingDeprecationWarning whenever django.utils.simplejson is
> used.
>
> * Django 1.2
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to say I agree with Malcolm. I don't believe we are currently
> hampered in any real way by bundling an old version of the SimpleJSON
> library, and it doesn't take that much effort to update the bundled
> ver
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 23:51 -0600, James Bennett wrote:
>> Apologies for bringing this up past the 1.1 feature deadline, but
>> since this isn't a feature perhaps it'll be OK :)
>>
>> Currently, Django bundles a copy
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 23:51 -0600, James Bennett wrote:
> Apologies for bringing this up past the 1.1 feature deadline, but
> since this isn't a feature perhaps it'll be OK :)
>
> Currently, Django bundles a copy of simplejson[1], at
> django.utils.simplejson. We use this solely in the serializa
Apologies for bringing this up past the 1.1 feature deadline, but
since this isn't a feature perhaps it'll be OK :)
Currently, Django bundles a copy of simplejson[1], at
django.utils.simplejson. We use this solely in the serialization
system to support dumping to and loading from JSON fixtures.
10 matches
Mail list logo
