On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:50 PM, alex.gay...@gmail.com <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think Eric's proposal is dead on, it accomplishes the same task, but > does it without inducing any overhead, since once we assume 2.6 we > inherently assume json is included. So +1 on it as Eric has > suggested, -0 as it was originally proposed. > > Alex +1 to Eric's proposal. I think Eric's proposal moves fits the right timeline where we don't think about simplejson till we have to. It's nice to have it on the Django 1.4/Python 2.6 so we're not duplicating a stdlib, but let's not worry too much about it.
Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
