ncationality to your app without touching the settings.py. Just
install the Django/GDAPS app per pip, restart the Django server / manage
migrate, and it should work.
It's not perfect ans still lacks some features, but should solve your
problem.
Yours, Christian
Am 03.04.23 um 16:
Am 25.02.23 um 17:58 schrieb Silent Coder:
Hi Christian and Group,
I'm new to Django and still learning the ropes, but I'm curious to
know what the use cases for something like this might be.
I don't want to use django-developers for this topic more than intended
(django dev
be sure everything is installed as
intended, and just order INSTALLED_APPS like I want to.
But it's not perfect, I know.
So thanks Jörg for your helpful comment. I wasn't quite sure about if I
did something stupid.
And thanks for your all engaging in Django, it's really a g
Am 22.02.23 um 22:37 schrieb Jörg Breitbart:
Am 21.02.23 um 22:05 schrieb Christian González:
My original question was HOW would I implement this in a
"good-practice" way, by not violating Django's conventions, and
showing a way it could be done clean.
I think thats not
c. Which gets bulky when using 20+ plugins, and
maintaining 300 different appliances (for 300 customers) with different
(and dynamically changing) plugins.
So again, does anything stand against loading plugins' INSTALLED_APPS
from a plugin's root module? Is there a better approach
rom the same vendor.
There is no trust problem when installing your own packages.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubs
even
creepier to me.
Eager to hear your opinion here.
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop r
ut reduces the same loading
time at startup. Which is neglegible IMHO.
Please tell me if I'm completely wrong - or if this is worth a bug
report/PR.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Djang
re or less this message would help a lot.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to d
AH, sorry. Just saw it:
# Functions from the following migrations need manual copying. # Move
them and any dependencies into this file, then update the # RunPython
operations to refer to the local versions: #
medux.core.migrations.0001_initial
Am 22.12.22 um 22:12 schrieb Christian González
n(
code=medux.core.migrations.0001_initial.create_admin_user,
),
Which is not working, as Python complains:
File
"/home/christian/Projekte/medux/src/medux/core/migrations/0001_squashed_0003_alter_address_id_alter_addressmapper_id_and_more.py",
line 57
code=m
and add a second
(optional) parameter named "instance"? The form could then just decide
in __init__ if (user|instance) is present, and save the one that is
present as self.user.
This would ensure that the view could also call it with "instance", both
would work.
Anythi
didn't understand why ModelForm does NOT localize
fields in the first place per default. You may have a good reason for that.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Cont
"" autofocus = None def get_form(self, form_class=None):form =
super().get_form(form_class) if self.autofocus in form.fields:
form.fields[self.autofocus].widget.attrs.update({"autofocus": True})
return form
Is this worth including in Django core?
Christian
--
Dr. Chr
AppConfigs only as proxy with a pointer to that model...
I kindly ask for your opinion here.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group
my part, I would *love* to see HTMX "included" in Django, as it
seems to be the perfect couple, if done right.
Christian
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 6:16 PM 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers
(Contributions to Django itself)
wrote:
Check out htmx as a way to av
.)
If it was for me, I even would add a neat HTMX integration to Django core.
Cheers, Christian
Am 15.10.21 um 08:52 schrieb Warren Havemann:
Hi everyone,
I've been contemplating the development of an SPA version of admin
either in Angular, React, Vue or even Flutter... preferably in Angular
.site.register(model)
except admin.sites.AlreadyRegistered:
pass
It would help getting started with Django more quickly.
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to
eturn (self.name, path, [], keywords)
This is a 4-tuple, and even the clone() method written after it calls it
with
name, path, args, kwargs =self.deconstruct()
So, is 3.2 documentation here on a <1.9 status? Am I understanding
something not correctly?
Thanks,
Christian
--
Dr. Christian
Am 28.06.21 um 10:44 schrieb 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers
(Contributions to Django itself):
> Plus, it's not *that* much code to "take inspiration from" in your own
> project, test, and change as you see fit.
That's true...
;-)
--
Dr. Christian
eplace Django's
TemplateCommand with it and inherit from it, I could bring it into shape.
Please drop me a line.
Best regards, Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contr
ctory.
Which is kind of nonsense - BUT, like I asked, could it be a possibility
to automate this process, to enable HMR for development?
Christian
Am 22.01.21 um 08:43 schrieb Christian González:
Hello Django community,
caution: long post, TL;DR at the bottom.
in the past months, I
-compressor with a plugin for that. Sorry, no
HMR here during development
including e.g. Vue or Alpine dynamically comes close to my ideal, but I
think a Js compile step is needed.
Do you have any thoughts here, hints about how to do that? Mission
impossible?
Best regards,
Christian
--
d I can't create a r/o user for that database.
So It would be really cool if I could tell Django in a DATABASES option
that this connection should never be written to.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contribut
O, see possible
dynamic nature like https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31527).
So I thought that Django providing a project name (which IS the import
path of the main application) would be a good idea.
Anyway, my own project will require a PROJECT_NAME variable, because of
this template overr
mplicit,
so why not
a) create a setting (which is created by django-admin createproject along with
the other parsed templates) named
PROJECT_NAME o DJANGO_PROJECT_NAME
or
b) (because settings are not used in wsgi.py, manage.py etc.) create it earlier
in the process - or does it have to be wri
Oh, sorry, I just saw that this is discussed (andanswered) in the PR.
Am 13.01.20 um 23:03 schrieb Christian González:
>
> Eh, sorry if I misunderstand - but adding a "default = true" line to
> an AppConfig is the same as addign default_app_config =
> "foo.apps.FooCon
lass is used - none of the two
ones. Maybe an error message would be better. default=true should only
be valid once!
Best regards,
Christian
Am 12.01.20 um 21:42 schrieb Aymeric Augustin:
> Hello,
>
> I created a PR for this: https://github.com/django/django/pull/12310
>
> I'd
e app name only - is ok.
I would bet that the vast majority of apps don't have two AppConfigs.
And to urge all devs to use the more elaborative AppConfig line in
INSTALLED_APPS, just to make such special cases (and THESE are the
special cases!) are possible, is wrong IMHO.
Let it be
/h in 50 speed limit on the street, when everyone else drives
55. Even Google allows it's self driving cars to drive faster than the
limit by 10% in some cases ;-)
What I mean is: Why don't you drop that recommendation - when noone is
using it - more than one AppConfigs still *are* possi
viour is
different when using this module, it doesn't make sense. Such a case
should be done in code (module B circumvents the default settings etc.)
- but settings merging / hierarchy maybe isn't the best way to go. I
also strictly believe in "namespaces are a good thing."
S
ve
config, installed apps would be defined already - and their paths should
be possible to determine by then. So *their* declarative settings could
be found and merged as well.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
reasons since I took it over.
Yes, this basically means namespacing. Depending on the size of the
library, this could be one big bunch of a setting.
> I think this pattern solves your first concern Christian.
No it doesn't completely. I used this pattern myself in GDAPS, copied
from gr
m
* load settings.py which allows to override them again (using some
special code tricks like dynamic loading, environments etc.)
Please tell me what you think about that.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
[app_label]
except KeyError:
message = "No installed app with label '%s'." % app_label
for app_config in self.get_app_configs():
if app_config.name == app_label:
message += " Did you mean '%s'?" % app_config.label
break
This c
label? Is this a bug?
Thanks,
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-developers+un
SECRET_KEY could be anywhere
by default, it doesn't have to be in an executable .py file. But this
would mean to change Django's code to read it before or after importing
settings.py.
+1 for a .gitignore file too.
Christian
Am 10.10.19 um 22:18 schrieb Ehigie Aito:
> Hello Bobby,
> I
ogging module as default?
Thanks,
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-developers+unsubscr..
glad now ;-)
Please, put that into the docs. I saw a talk of the author of django-ddp
(a meteor backend served by Django) who spoke a lot about signals, and
that they are not nice in terms of performance. This is quite a point.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscr
This is exactly the ticket my issue is about, des. I'll follow the Konversation there.
Thanks Stephen.
Greets,
Christian
Am 17.09.2019 18:19 schrieb "Stephen J. Butler" :Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but tablespace has to do with physical storage of the schema, not how tables
something completely wrong and it's just my missing
configuration?
thanks,
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscr
would
be a big benefit IMHO.
If I understood all correctly.
Greets, Christian
Am 05.09.19 um 15:45 schrieb Tom Forbes:
> That's not necessarily a blocker, and Memcached is not simple to run
> on Windows either - there are no official prebuilt binaries, as far as
> I'm
y GDAPS plugins system as well, instead of
hacking myself into INSTALLED_APPS within settings.py.
Just my 2 cents.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe f
manage.py startproject
foo" are NO Appconfigs addressed in INSTALLED_APPS. Nobody does this, right?
How "obligate" is this recommendation, when noone uses it? Should this
be kept?
Thanks,
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
alled then when CorePlugin is 2.0.0. So Core is like any other plugin.
And so all plugins depend on Core plugin and could override its
defaults. Next problem here is, what if 2 plugins override the default
of a third one. The last in the loading row wins then.
There are MANY things to
> I've given some thought to this over the years, and what I think we've
> somehow missed in settings until now is ... Namespaces!
I can second this from my POV, having "evaluated" a few plugin systems now.
> Any plugin or app ought be able to declare its own settings and their
> defaults. And
to Django (or GDAPS), the loading of apps (GDAPS
plugins) could be at least done automatically in a way that dependant
apps are loaded after their dependencies.
So far... much to do.
I hope earth is going to spin slower soon, so a day gets more than 24h. ;-)
Christian
--
You received this messag
Hi all,
sorry, I never managed to introduce myself properly to this mailing
list. Christian Gonzalez, more or less hobby programmer, MD as day job.
I maybe never will add something substantial to Django core itself, but
ATM "scratching my own itch" here:
Just wanted to say that I finis
>
> It looks like app maintainers really ought to give django-gdaps a
> shot. Perhaps Christian, another way would be to contribute gdap
> support to the apps you like to use in the ecosystem. Then their
> maintainers could benefit from it if they install gdaps and so it can
>
}
}
)
And the app webpack_loader is located *after* this app in INSTALLED
apps. Within webpack-loader, the settings dict WEBPACK_LOADER inclusive
"foobar" is available. So this is kind of "solved" for me - but - it's a
bit of a hack.
I'd r
is MY_SETTING is not
available globally then? E.g. by apps that are ordered below the app in
INSTALLED APPS that declared MY_SETTING?
> Here we're talking about something slightly different: formalizing how
> an application can declare default values for its own settings —
> essentiall
value
(Sorry for this maybe shitty code hack)
Which then loads everything from installed apps - and later lines would
override these "defaults"...?
I don't even know if this is possible.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message becaus
eally bad workaround, and does not function like I would
"phthonically" like it.
Christian
Am 07.05.19 um 17:02 schrieb J. Pic:
> Great idea Christian, actually some frameworks have this kind of
> feature, such as CakePHP, in which apps can also inject urls and
> middlewares for ex
o load settings from
apps too, e.g. with a hook like having .settings.py? which are
merged into the main settings? Is this considered as security risk?
Thanks,
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
.org/git/20190410162409.117264-1-b...@google.com/
So on the long run, no need for git-hyper-blame.
Christian
--
Dr. Christian González
https://nerdocs.at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" gr
Am 14.04.19 um 12:15 schrieb Florian Apolloner:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I think you are making a good argument here. On one hand short-comings
> in our tool chain should not block us from making changes. On the
> other hand, we do have to live with them -- so having at least some
>
ying that I'm completely insane, or git already has this
feature, or Ii forgot something, I could try and add a git feature
request for that. Even if implemented in 2 years, It could be made sure
later that git blame worked correctly backwards then.
TL;DR: Use black with Django without compromi
integrate channels more deeply into Django,
together with frontend 2-way data bindings, push notifications etc., I
would really appreciate it and could imagine supporting that using money
too.
Cheers,
Christian
Am 22.01.19 um 15:18 schrieb John Obelenus:
Chiming in. As a long-time django user (near
gin system in the first case, but I think that
having a (maybe also pluggable) frontend (like Vue, React, Angular,
Polymer etc.) there would be a good idea.
Maybe this is something completely different, but maybe you'll find some
common parts with your intentions - feel free to share ideas.
t some less
> clean.
Ok, thanks. I'm already working on extracting my plugin system and
making it more generic ;-)
I'll post a link when I can release a bit of code.
Christian
[1]
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/ref/applications/#for-application-authors
--
You received th
:
prl_patterns += pattern.get_patterns
This way all plugins can just "implement" predefined Interfaces, supereasy.
Greetings from Salzburg,
Christian
> [1] https://github.com/pretix/pretix
> [2] https://packaging.python.org/specifications/entry-points/
> [3]
> https://
Hello DjangoDevs,
I'm new here to this group, and to be honest, just a "fake" developer.
Doing that is not my main job. So please be patient with my maybe
BadIdea(tm).
Another warning: much text. Hint: there is a TL;DR at the end.
I stumbled upon a "missing feature" in Django, which I call "dyna
I also think that this won't need to be in core since a Model Subclass
works. We use this in our Application since we can't hard delete stuff so
we overwritten the Model Field and the manager that all tables contain a
date_deleted field which will be set when calling delete() objects.delete().
And
any," which isn't feasible in shipping
products.). It seems that the same optimization work could be done at
application time though, couldn't it?
Are there already plans to add an optimizer for the full migration? What
are the big issues blocking it?
Thanks,
Christian
-
fice as opposed to needing a build environment and
source to install it.
It's starting to sound like the best bet for us is to move away from
pip/easy_install for end-user consumption of the software and onto more of
a dedicated installer that can manage dependencies more explicitly, maybe
t
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Markus Holtermann wrote:
> Hey Christian,
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 02:41:49PM -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Regarding the version number, from what I've read, there's still a
>> reported
>> compatibility issue
s, though, we sign all the builds and
include checksums in both the links and in dedicated .sha256sum files. Not
the best solution, but it's something at least :/
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.bea
security fixes to a
branch, ensured the test suite passes with flying colors, and have added a
README detailing everything you've requested. This is all up at
https://github.com/beanbaginc/django. Let me know if there's anything you'd
like changed.
Thanks,
Christian
On Fri
I mean I made the proposal, but one drawback will be when linking to
Postgresql Docs, what if they change the links? I mean that's barely
happend in the past, however the "
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/non-durability.html"; is
fairly new. (9.x).
So we need to track every major upgr
Didn't you missed jsonb from Marc Tamlyn aswell? It's one of the greatest
features for Postgresql
Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 19:19:38 UTC+2 schrieb Tim Graham:
>
> Currently we have two items on the roadmap:
> https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.9Roadmap
>
> PostgreSQL Full Text Search <
Wouldn't it be enough to just have link to the correct PostgreSQL site:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/non-durability.html
And then some text with "if you want to run your tests on postgresql please
see the docs around non durable postgres"
2015-07-13 18:46 GMT+02:00 Federico Capoan
Hello, I read carefully through out the Django Docs and found one comment
really misleading
(https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/ref/models/fields/#foreignkey):
> Behind the scenes, Django appends "_id" to the field name to create its
database column name. In the above example,
> the database
security issues, etc.
Thanks!
Christian
On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 10:02:40 AM UTC-7, Carl Meyer wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to write this up carefully, research the
> history, etc. I think some form of extended community-based support
> could work, but I
Somehow I hate it. The website is the worst website I've seen since a long
time.
The contrast is really aweful.
The issue Tracker got unusable due to the colors that aren't focused on
readability.
Overall it looks like a mess, just to have a new design.
Doesn't look like a designer or a graphic g
>
> Nope. a large OFFSET of N will read through N rows, regardless index
> coverage. see http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/queries-limit.html
>
That's simple not true.
If you define a Order By with a well indexes query, the database will only
do a bitmap scan.
This wiki isn't well explaine
A sequence scan will only be made, if you query non indexed values.
So if you add a simple ORDER BY you will make a index scan, which is very
fast.
The problem relies more on the database than on the ORM.
As already said. If you need to deal with that much queries you need to log
your SQL statement
Sorry, but I don't think this is suitable.
If somebody has 100M rows per Table then, he should prolly think about
sharding/replication anyway. So the ORM would still suffer anyway.
Currently my company has a few tables with a high count as well but since
we never used the django-admin and managed t
Is there a way to merge user accounts? Currently my github Account is
c-schmitt, while my Trac user account ist merb.
—
Best Regards
Christian Schmitt
c.schm...@briefdomain.de
Am 24.08.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Ben Finney :
> Aymeric Augustin
>
> writes:
>
>> Contr
I'm a little bit concerned about that.
First I'm using a different user on Trac than on Github, so everything I
wrote so far will getting lost (not that bad problem for me), but I think
there are many users who are in the same situation.
The next thing is vendor lock-in. What will happen if Github
> Christian, have you seen the patch review checklist I put together?
Yep and I will definitely do some more work in the future.
Everything i write now is my personal opinion.
first of all trac has some of the weakest Query Filters. (thats my personal
opinion)
the next thing is that changing
locker for a lot of things on my side. i think the ux is
somewhat bad, but thats just an own perspective.
2014-08-01 21:49 GMT+02:00 Carl Meyer :
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 08/01/2014 01:37 PM, Schmitt, Christian wrote:
> [snip]
> > i mean maybe we should really look at a re
;
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org>:
> On 1 août 2014, at 18:31, Christian Schmitt
> wrote:
>
> Since you've introduced these changes, wouldn't it be suitable to change
> Django's commit / review system entirely?
>
>
> “Hey, you climbed this hill just
Since you've introduced these changes, wouldn't it be suitable to change
Django's commit / review system entirely?
Like introduce gerrit, where very commit / ticket needs to be reviewed by X
people and then it would be marked as merge ready and a "core" or whoever
member could merge that.
There
Currently I don't think there is a need for a second RC yet.
As already said you could easily install via Git (maybe we should add that
to the docs)
Like:
"If you want to test the latest development version of Django just use pip
and git to install it:
pip install git+https://github.com/django/
HI,
Currently we developing a Greater Application with many Apps and Models per
App that are referenced through the Apps. We have like 30+ Models and we've
seen an increase of the test suite, too. And what I've seen so far is that
the Post Migrate from the Auth App will take the longest time to
encourage people to not use fixtures and build their test data
> within the scope of the test or the TestCase.
>
> Regards,
> Michael manfre
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Schmitt, Christian <
> c.sc...@briefdomain.de > wrote:
>
>> Just a quick questi
Just a quick question regarding to these posts / tickets.
In the last few weeks we fixed: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/22487
So I think that we now don't need to rely on fixtures and should just tell
the people to use that behavior in the first place.
I mean I'm not a Django core develop
This is already merged.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/topics/db/models/#multi-table-inheritance
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2014 11:27:01 UTC+2 schrieb guettli:
>
> Single Table Inheritance is used by ruby-on-rails and SQLAlchemy.
>
> Are there reasons why it is used in django?
>
> I would lov
only one, so the
1.7 release wouldn’t be that useful for these people as it will be to other
people that don’t use data migrations and/or don’t test their applications.
—
Best Regards
Christian Schmitt
c.schm...@briefdomain.de
Am 22.04.2014 um 03:22 schrieb Russell Keith-Magee :
> defer
hm, at first i didn't even read the release notes..
But i think we should definitly make a blocker issue in trac.
Currently re-introduce initial_data is the worst thing we could do, since
django 1.9 requires migrations and do deprecate that behavior:
> Deprecated since version 1.7: If an applicati
we should look into deprecating flushing? It's not a behaviour
> that can be easily replicated any more, as it relied on the old system of
> one-shot schema and load a single file, but it's also kind of crucial to
> non-transactional tests...
>
> Andrew
>
>
&g
Currently my way to fix it will be to rewrite everything and don’t really on
data that needs to be in the database. or i don’t make integrations tests via
the django client. i mean the application is so big that it takes up to 5
seconds to create the test database. which is intact a lot.
but that
Hello,
currently I try to make a TestSuite for a already grown application and it
is horrible to do so.
But thats not why I'm writing here.
Our Application has some data migrations, previously we used South, now we
use the Django 1.7 Migrations with RunPython to do so.
In the Docs there is als
cleaned up and updated.
—
Best Regards
Christian Schmitt
c.schm...@briefdomain.de
Am 01.03.2014 um 12:46 schrieb Florian Apolloner :
> Hi,
>
> there is no need to mail django-developers when you open a PR -- we do
> monitor the relevant lists.
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
>
&
I'm not a django-developer, but I'm creating a lot of applications with
Django and I would never want to switch to Jinja2.
Why?
The first thing is that Django Templates are simple to understand, they are
not formed as a new DSL or a Programmable way of a Template language.
Their Syntax is clear a
tions.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Christian Schmitt <
> c.sc...@briefdomain.de > wrote:
>
>> I didn't found anything in the docs... So... could I stil load a fixture
>> with a migration? Like here:
>> http://south.readt
I didn't found anything in the docs... So... could I stil load a fixture
with a migration? Like here:
http://south.readthedocs.org/en/latest/fixtures.html
Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2013 17:41:22 UTC+1 schrieb Andrew Godwin:
>
> This will also be true for django.db.migrations; there's no way we ca
I can't change my last post so...
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2284#no1 this ticket looks resolved.
Take a look at :
https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/core/management/sql.py#L153
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013 20:34:54 UTC+1 schrieb Christian Schmitt:
>
Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2013 23:37:15 UTC+1 schrieb Carl Meyer:
>
>
> So I would focus more on finding an issue that interests you technically
> or solves a problem you are facing (which will give you motivation to
> work on it). The metadata needed for this query (component, mostly) does
> ten
I also hoped that the release date will be way before the 15th of may.
Also just a question.. I currently looking forward to maybe contribute
something back to django. But I always struggle with trac it looks so
extremly messy.
I mean i try to query some unresolved, accepted queries:
https://code
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo