On 2/25/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# generated settings file contains INSTALLED_APPS with the basics,# such as sessions, auth, etc.. Advanced users can remove any or all of that# if they don't want to use it.python foo/manage.py synchdb # creates tables for all
I think the syncdb thing is fantastic, and will make installations much easier!
On 2/25/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay then; init-minimal, we had only a short time to get to know you .
> > . . we'll miss you so! ::sni
On 2/24/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay then; init-minimal, we had only a short time to get to know you .
> . . we'll miss you so! ::sniff:: :-D
Well, whaddya know -- the tests *do* fail! Thanks for pointing that
out. I've fixed it.
Sorry I didn't notify the list here...Jacob a
On Friday 24 February 2006 23:34, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 2/19/06, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/19/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think I've found a bug in bulk delete.
> >
> > Other than that - I'll look into it.
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> I have put to
On 2/24/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I was creating init-minimal I thought it would actually do
> something, but as I reorganized the modules, it looked more and more
> like it wasn't needed at all. (I certainly thought it would be
> necessary before I started though.) So
On 2/24/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/24/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 24 February 2006 23:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > magic-removal: Removed 'init-minimal', which wasn't doing anything
> > > useful
> >
> > It seems to be used by runtests.
I'm not sure that this is 100% relevant to this discussion, but wanted
to share it in the context of this thread.
A Python type checking module:
http://www.ilowe.net/software/typecheck/
--Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
On 2/24/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 24 February 2006 23:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > magic-removal: Removed 'init-minimal', which wasn't doing anything
> > useful
>
> It seems to be used by runtests.py...was this an oversight Adrian?
Yeah, that one caught me by su
On Friday 24 February 2006 23:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> magic-removal: Removed 'init-minimal', which wasn't doing anything
> useful
It seems to be used by runtests.py...was this an oversight Adrian?
Luke
--
Parenthetical remarks (however relevant) are unnecessary
Luke Plant || L.Plant.9
On 2/19/06, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/19/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think I've found a bug in bulk delete.
>
> Other than that - I'll look into it.
Hi Luke,
I have put together a test case using your model - my test case works
fine using the
Thanks in advance for the status update, Adrian, I think it's a good
idea. I'm not surprised things stalled out a little -- with 0.92 slated
to incorporate magic-removal, there's less incentive to work on the
current trunk, and with so much backwards-incompatible stuff the merge
is sure to be chal
Nebojša Đorđević wrote:
> On 2006-02-22, at 11:18 CET, hugo wrote:
>
>> I would propose to instead do validation in those situations where the
>> data is moved to the external storage - on .save() (or in the
>> unit-of-works .save() if we have them). That way you can happily
>> create
>> invali
12 matches
Mail list logo
