On 2/24/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/24/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Friday 24 February 2006 23:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > magic-removal: Removed 'init-minimal', which wasn't doing anything > > > useful > > > > It seems to be used by runtests.py...was this an oversight Adrian? > > Yeah, that one caught me by surprise too, especially considering that > Adrian said the following only a few weeks ago in another thread: > > On 1/6/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I really like your idea of "init" and "init-minimal" -- that > > accomplishes the clean split of auth/core into regular apps while > > keeping it just as easy to install the basics. Let's do it! > > Did something change in our thinking here?
As I was creating init-minimal I thought it would actually do something, but as I reorganized the modules, it looked more and more like it wasn't needed at all. (I certainly thought it would be necessary before I started though.) Some of the tests still rely on django.contrib.contenttypes, but like I said in the comments, that should probably be done in the setup for tests that rely on it. I don't think init-minimal serves any purpose other than that, and as such Adrian did the right thing for the long run. There is the matter of the broken tests though ;-) Joseph --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
