On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:44 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Indeed, and other vendors hook into it, so it's probably bad form to
> ignore it. I've committed functionality in
> cad70317771fa6ce1f52af9d357165d47e971d7d to exercise this -- can you
> please check and let me know it's okay. Thanks.
Than
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael
Terry wrote:
> The decision about powersave-mode and such needn't be made a priori by
> dk-p, but could be made by the distribution in whether to ship the
> powersave-mode power.d script as part of pm-utils. The power.d
> mechanism doesn't strike me as inhe
Michael Terry [2009-06-26 8:50 -0400]:
> The decision about powersave-mode and such needn't be made a priori by
> dk-p, but could be made by the distribution in whether to ship the
> powersave-mode power.d script as part of pm-utils. The power.d
> mechanism doesn't strike me as inherently bad.
I
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 08:08 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
> But one additional thing that pm-powersave does is allow applications to
> hook into am-I-on-battery? events and run a script (by dropping them
> in /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d). Is there a replacement for such a
> mechanism?
Could I get som
