Michael Terry [2009-06-26 8:50 -0400]: > The decision about powersave-mode and such needn't be made a priori by > dk-p, but could be made by the distribution in whether to ship the > powersave-mode power.d script as part of pm-utils. The power.d > mechanism doesn't strike me as inherently bad.
I agree. Calling pm-powersave as a mechanism for applications to plug into (power.d/*) continues to make sense to me, for the use cases you mentioned. Since DK-P already knows when batteries/AC changes, this seems like the appropriate place to me as well. Richard, what do you think? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
