On 21/5/21 1:16 AM, Jason H wrote:
I'd like to see Qt take on the web, the pieces are there, with WebAssembly
and QHttpServer. The web meanwhile has gotten more Qt-like with webpack and
other compilation-step tools. I think this would really embiggen the Qt
community
+2!
Qt Everywhere!
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 at 8:57 AM
> From: "Kai Köhne"
> To: "Benjamin TERRIER" , "development@qt-project.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [Development] Renamed: Running a service for Qt community
>
> > From: Development On Behalf Of
>
On 5/21/21 2:49 PM, Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
Please don't cut half of what I said to make me say something I did not say.
I did not do that at all. I merely quoted what I wanted to answer.
You said that during Trolltech times that Qt Windows was commercial
only and the open source part was u
> From: Development On Behalf Of Benjamin
> TERRIER
> Subject: Re: [Development] Renamed: Running a service for Qt community
>
> On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 17:18, Jason H <mailto:jh...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, these issues aren't insurmountable, apparent
On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 14:32, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> On 5/21/21 12:41 PM, Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
>
> > And now:
> > - all new modules and supported platforms are Commercial/GPLv3 only.
>
> Which is very different from commercial-only.
>
Please don't cut half of what I said to make me say some
On 5/21/21 12:41 PM, Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
And now:
- all new modules and supported platforms are Commercial/GPLv3 only.
Which is very different from commercial-only.
Can we conclude that contributions from outside the company are going to
be nearly non-existent?
Based on the facts? No.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 17:18, Jason H wrote:
>
> Anyway, these issues aren't insurmountable, apparently they can be changed
> with the stroke of a pen. (Where is Qt's Open Governance? - still think I
> misunderstood what that was about)
Since TQC alone can decide that the Qt Project won't relea
On 5/20/21 5:16 PM, Jason H wrote:
*if you wonder why I keep calling them Digia and not the Qt Company, it is
because the actions of late don't really feel like Qt of old (Nokia, TrollTech)
would have treated opens source users that way. Looking at the management:
https://investors.qt.io/gove
Am 20.05.21 um 17:16 schrieb Jason H:
(...)
I was there when Digia renamed themselves to the Qt Company*.
(...)
*if you wonder why I keep calling them Digia and not the Qt Company, it is
because the actions of late don't really feel like Qt of old (Nokia, TrollTech)
would have treated opens s
> So, how many people and entities do we have in the Qt community that have the
> capacity, competence, and credentials to run a service? I personally would
> very much like to see certain aspects of the community at large to be less
> entangled with The Qt Company. The qt-project.org page is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
