> From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Benjamin > TERRIER > Subject: Re: [Development] Renamed: Running a service for Qt community > > On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 17:18, Jason H <mailto:jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > >> Anyway, these issues aren't insurmountable, apparently they can be changed >> with the stroke of a pen. (Where is Qt's Open Governance? - still think I >> misunderstood what that was about) > > Since TQC alone can decide that the Qt Project won't release Qt 5.15.3+ > without consulting the mailing list and going through the lazy consensus > decision process, I think it's safe to say that Open Governance is dead.
I don't claim that the LTS decision was fully in line with the Open Governance process as stated in https://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0002.html . But Open Governance is IMO serving the purpose of steering the development of the Qt code quite well. I think we can do better in also discussing designs etc on the mailing list, but well... > Can we conclude that contributions from outside the company are going to be > nearly > non-existent? I hope not 😊 You can check out some statistics about code contributions at qt-project.org . There's also Thiago's generated statistics : https://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-stats/current/ . Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
