On Wednesday 15 October 2014 14:39:27 Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >To avoid further delaying of the final release, I'm going to pull
> >QVersionNumber from 5.4.
>
> careful: it is already used in:
> qtactiveqt/examples/activeqt/webbrowser/main.cpp
Thanks, I'll revert that too, but I can
Hi,
>To avoid further delaying of the final release, I'm going to pull
>QVersionNumber from 5.4.
careful: it is already used in:
qtactiveqt/examples/activeqt/webbrowser/main.cpp
Regards,
Friedemann
--
Friedemann Kleint Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 11:43:46 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:36:40AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Relatively speaking, this is a major refactor of QVersionNumber.
>
> yes, but absolutely speaking, it is trivial (because the whole class is
> almost trivial, and
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:36:40AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Relatively speaking, this is a major refactor of QVersionNumber.
>
yes, but absolutely speaking, it is trivial (because the whole class is
almost trivial, and thus such excellent material for bikeshedding :D).
so get on with it alr
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 20:41:22 Knoll Lars wrote:
> >In my opinion those changes - as big as they may seem - could go in after
> >the
> >beat. Yes, they change the implementation a lot, but they barely affect
> >the
> >API. The beta is about being able to try out new features in Qt and
> >get
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt-
>[...]
> I just need a confirmation that if I stage them now, they will still be in the
> beta.
That'll delay the beta at least till next week, and potentially even longer
(given our problems of getting both
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 14:28:05 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> The changes are ready, just pending approval:
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95531
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95532
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95533
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/96073
>
> The important on
On 14/10/14 16:41, "Simon Hausmann"
wrote:
>On Tuesday 14. October 2014 14.28.05 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Tuesday 14 October 2014 11:59:50 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> > >Since it's a large refactoring, if we miss 5.4, I don't think we
>>should
>> > >add it
>> > >to 5.4 at all. And since it's totally
On Tuesday 14. October 2014 14.28.05 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 October 2014 11:59:50 Knoll Lars wrote:
> > >Since it's a large refactoring, if we miss 5.4, I don't think we should
> > >add it
> > >to 5.4 at all. And since it's totally binary incompatible, it wouldn't be
> > >added to 5
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 11:59:50 Knoll Lars wrote:
> >Since it's a large refactoring, if we miss 5.4, I don't think we should
> >add it
> >to 5.4 at all. And since it's totally binary incompatible, it wouldn't be
> >added to 5.x at all.
>
>
> Are you asking to delay the beta, or for an except
Hi Thiago,
On 14/10/14 13:42, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 October 2014 09:08:54 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
>> Packages should have final beta content
>
>Hi guys, I need an exception for beta content. I have a pending refactor
>of
>QVersionNumber that still isn't approved. It should integ
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 09:08:54 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
> Packages should have final beta content
Hi guys, I need an exception for beta content. I have a pending refactor of
QVersionNumber that still isn't approved. It should integrate without problems
once it's approved (FamousLastWords™), bu
Hi all,
We have finally updated content in Qt5.4 beta snapshot packages.
Linux packages are here:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-10-13_44/
Most of windows ones here:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-10-14_40/
Unfortunately mac p
13 matches
Mail list logo
