On Tuesday 14 October 2014 11:59:50 Knoll Lars wrote: > >Since it's a large refactoring, if we miss 5.4, I don't think we should > >add it > >to 5.4 at all. And since it's totally binary incompatible, it wouldn't be > >added to 5.x at all. > > > Are you asking to delay the beta, or for an exception to add the change > after the beta? I would prefer the second option given how many issues we > had getting the beta together.
I don't want to add the change after the beta is released. If we don't get these changes in for the beta content, I'll abandon them. The changes are ready, just pending approval: https://codereview.qt-project.org/95531 https://codereview.qt-project.org/95532 https://codereview.qt-project.org/95533 https://codereview.qt-project.org/96073 The important ones are the second and third ones. The fourth one is an optimisation that can be added at any time. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
