Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-06 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Friday, January 06, 2012 15:41:19 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > This gives us both an incremental way to test the features, and one well > defined time where we merge them all into master. Great, sounds good to me. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG

Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-06 Thread lars.knoll
On 1/6/12 8:32 AM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote: >On Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:04:38 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: >> We have around a month left until Feb 4th, the date I would like to >>start >> with a feature freeze for Qt 5, and it's high time we get some more >> structure behind things to see

Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-06 Thread marius.storm-olsen
> We also can't move existing bugs to be a subtask of that one. Can > someone please move > https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-22622 to be a subtask of > QTBUG-20885? Done -- .marius ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org htt

Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:04:38 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > We have around a month left until Feb 4th, the date I would like to start > with a feature freeze for Qt 5, and it's high time we get some more > structure behind things to see where we are and what's left to do. I mostly agree w

Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 5 de January de 2012 12.03.02, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > - new atomics: no change in API, it's source compatible and all the > > > >functions > >are inline. It does however change the mangling for "QBasicAtomicInt", so > >any > >functions that take that as a parameter, return tha

Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-05 Thread lars.knoll
On 1/5/12 12:28 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On Thursday, 5 de January de 2012 10.04.38, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: >> This means that if you have something that you think needs to be done >> before the feature freeze (or is a feature that you need to get in as an >> exception later on), pl

Re: [Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 5 de January de 2012 10.04.38, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > This means that if you have something that you think needs to be done > before the feature freeze (or is a feature that you need to get in as an > exception later on), please create a JIRA task for it and make it a sub > task

[Development] Qt 5 feature freeze

2012-01-05 Thread lars.knoll
Hi everybody, first of all let me wish you all a happy new year. I hope you all managed to have a nice break over christmas. I spent the last two weeks with my family relaxing and skiing. I was mostly successful in not touching a computer during these days :) We have around a month left until Feb