On 1/5/12 12:28 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thursday, 5 de January de 2012 10.04.38, [email protected] wrote: >> This means that if you have something that you think needs to be done >> before the feature freeze (or is a feature that you need to get in as an >> exception later on), please create a JIRA task for it and make it a sub >> task of QTBUG-20885. It would be great if you could all spend some >>minutes >> this week to do this so that we have a decent overview early next week. > >I've added the one for the new QUrl, which definitely needs to be in 5.0 >or not >at all > https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-23469 > >But as I was going to do the next, I realised that it doesn't need to be >in >5.0, it would just be nice. They are: > > - new Q_GLOBAL_STATIC: since the current API is not public, breaking it >in >future releases is acceptable. Agree, it's not a hard requirement. > > - new atomics: no change in API, it's source compatible and all the >functions >are inline. It does however change the mangling for "QBasicAtomicInt", so >any >functions that take that as a parameter, return that or have it in their >template parameters would break BC. Add this one, as it should go in, but in the worst case we can do it later. Cheers, Lars > >Do you want me to add them too? >-- >Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 > Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
